From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shriramana Sharma Subject: Re: A safe scanf function Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:45:54 +0530 Message-ID: <200602272045.54327.samjnaa@gmail.com> References: <200602261347.20494.samjnaa@gmail.com> <17409.51844.97168.392901@cerise.gclements.plus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <17409.51844.97168.392901@cerise.gclements.plus.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Linux C Programming List Sunday, 26 February 2006 21:04 samaye tvayaa likhitam: > Probably because its trivial to write it yourself if that's what you > really want. But instead of forcing every author of a C program to implement such a function, I still feel a safe version should be included in the library itself. -- Tux #395953 resides at http://samvit.org playing with KDE 3.51 on SUSE Linux 10.0 $ date [] CCE +2006-02-27 W09-1 UTC+0530