From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: leslie.polzer@gmx.net Subject: Re: C or C++ Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:17:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20070504111740.GA11947@wintermute.farpoint> References: <463B1244.6080802@gmail.com> Reply-To: leslie.polzer@gmx.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <463B1244.6080802@gmail.com> Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: To: Shriramana Sharma Cc: Linux C Programming List --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:30:20PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > A voice inside tells me -- Qt and KDE are pure C++, yet they are among > the hugest-used (if there is such a word) libraries... But another > voice tells me -- there is GTK, GNOME and so many other libraries > which I do not know which may be having many users precisely because > they are in pure C... I choose C or C++ depending on the approach I plan to use. If it's system programming, or anything procedural, I'm most likely going to use C. If it's some high-level modeling that excellently suits OOP, I'm going for C++. I can therefore only answer your question if you tell me what the library will do. Leslie --=20 Personal homepage: https://viridian.dnsalias.net/~sky/homepage/ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83 --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGOxZUyYzv6N1Ov4MRApKUAJ9ohVKPaiHqy0UKq4Mf5CmroY6TKQCfU7qm ykeMqj1OsQNpOnN2Aix5Fw4= =cBxS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--