linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bogdan Cristea <cristeab@gmail.com>
To: Chrysostomos Nanakos <nanakos@wired-net.gr>
Cc: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: printf and long double
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:03:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010041503.27721.cristeab@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CA9C086.1050401@wired-net.gr>

On Monday 04 October 2010 14:54:46 you wrote:
> I wish I could get 24 decimal digits precision with the current long 
> double (80-bit). I can't get more than 15 digits even in a simple division.
> I think that the extended-precision can't give more than 19 decimal 
> digits of precision (log(10,2^64)=19.2). The quadruple precision can 
> give at most 34 decimal digits (log(10,2^113)=34).
> 
> Please consider the example below:
> --------------------------------------------------
> long double a = 1.0L/7.0L;
> printf("%Lf\n",a);
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> Can't get more than 15 digits precision....-:(
> Is this a compiler problem or libc's problem? In x86_64 machines the 
> long double values supposed to give at least 106-bit precision even when 
> implemented in software. Is gcc compliant with the quadruple notation?

Have you tried to specify manually the number of digits after the decimal 
point ?

	long double a = 1.0L/7.0L;
	printf("%'.100Lf\n",a);

On a 64 bits machine the output is:

0.1428571428571428571409210675491330277964152628555893898010253906250000000000000000000000000000000000

regards
Bogdan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-04 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-03 22:56 printf and long double Nanakos Chrysostomos
2010-10-04  0:43 ` Gedare Bloom
2010-10-04  1:44   ` Glynn Clements
2010-10-04  1:33 ` Glynn Clements
2010-10-04 11:54   ` Chrysostomos Nanakos
2010-10-04 12:03     ` Bogdan Cristea [this message]
2010-10-04 12:12       ` Chrysostomos Nanakos
2010-10-06 20:18       ` printf and long double [SOLVED] Nanakos Chrysostomos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201010041503.27721.cristeab@gmail.com \
    --to=cristeab@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nanakos@wired-net.gr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).