From: "Lejanson C. Go" <lejanson@ntsp.nec.co.jp>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SIOCGMIIPHY and SIOCGIFCONF
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:31:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40EBA6C7.902@hq.ntsp.nec.co.jp> (raw)
Good day,
I am a newbie in this list. I am bit confused in this 2 flags.
I am planning to make a network program which determines if the
interface is still up, down or unknown in real time.
Which of the 2 should I used? Which is more advisable?
Thanks a lot.
Lejanson
--
Revenge is best served when cold.
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-07 7:31 Lejanson C. Go [this message]
2004-07-07 8:27 ` SIOCGMIIPHY and SIOCGIFCONF Glynn Clements
2004-07-07 8:45 ` Lejanson C. Go
2004-07-07 21:34 ` John Richard Moser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40EBA6C7.902@hq.ntsp.nec.co.jp \
--to=lejanson@ntsp.nec.co.jp \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).