From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
To: Linux C Programming List <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: include guards
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:13:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46720AFF.6070402@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello.
To prevent header files from being included more than once in the same
translation unit, we use include guards like
# ifndef FOO_H
# define FOO_H
...
# endif
Recently I came to know that I can use simply:
# pragma once
instead of the above group of sentences and the desired effect is still
accomplished.
This leads me to think of two things:
1. why use the ifndef-define-endif method when the pragma once method is
simpler and cleaner?
2. why should we need to use either method at all? If it is a
universally undesirable behaviour that the same header file is included
in a translation unit more than once, then an intelligent compiler (or
preprocessor) itself can by default take of this, right?
I understand that to write portable code that compiles on
not-so-intelligent compilers, we may need to do something manually, so
question 2 is answered, but question 1 still stands...
Shriramana Sharma.
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-15 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-15 3:43 Shriramana Sharma [this message]
2007-06-20 12:43 ` include guards wwp
2007-06-20 15:09 ` Steve Graegert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46720AFF.6070402@gmail.com \
--to=samjnaa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).