linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* singleton pattern really necessary?
@ 2007-07-22  6:32 Shriramana Sharma
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Shriramana Sharma @ 2007-07-22  6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux C Programming List

I was wondering, if a person wants there to be only one instance of a 
class, they can simply do something like:

class {
<class definition here>
} classInstance ;

which automatically creates a single instance of a class. Why go to the 
extent of locking the constructor, copy constructor, operator= etc? The 
only possible thing (that I can think of) that cannot be done is 
conveniently passing it as an argument to a function. Is there any other 
reason that would make a class-name necessary?

Shriramana Sharma.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-07-22  6:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-22  6:32 singleton pattern really necessary? Shriramana Sharma

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).