* singleton pattern really necessary?
@ 2007-07-22 6:32 Shriramana Sharma
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Shriramana Sharma @ 2007-07-22 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux C Programming List
I was wondering, if a person wants there to be only one instance of a
class, they can simply do something like:
class {
<class definition here>
} classInstance ;
which automatically creates a single instance of a class. Why go to the
extent of locking the constructor, copy constructor, operator= etc? The
only possible thing (that I can think of) that cannot be done is
conveniently passing it as an argument to a function. Is there any other
reason that would make a class-name necessary?
Shriramana Sharma.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-07-22 6:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-22 6:32 singleton pattern really necessary? Shriramana Sharma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).