From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Santosh Sivaraj <ssantosh@fossix.org>
Subject: Re: malloc
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:13:02 +0530
Message-ID: <4D0EDED6.1010100@fossix.org>
References: <AANLkTi=y+++cekRzdH5WMNWOyRg1=TaA6eAeq1dL9+A0@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=y+++cekRzdH5WMNWOyRg1=TaA6eAeq1dL9+A0@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: ratheesh k <ratheesh.ksz@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org

On 12/20/2010 10:09 AM, ratheesh k wrote:
> Is the below statement right or wrong ?
>
> malloc tries to allocate continous memmory space in virtual address
> space.  not in physical address space.
It is right, you could have googled it.