From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=c3=abl_Kr=c3=a4hemann?= Subject: functional tests for atomic operations Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 23:37:09 +0000 Message-ID: <55270D25.9040407@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fr2lK59t+KEbBAU0ghdoqAbjnrVFjJMLL5IHvqfaUs0=; b=M64qMflwAPq3AysWSKRfLFMfZyE/AtxrLQHlEh1eiIxeFmkfPCtjqlrp4gVgwiAKfC AppuIsKkM3iHHQiV/+LQqGF9GouSjTSbs+tRWq3xst1MPdVNxAb8VuVxTi88wjogl722 Ad/saqcXkIJ6kQ2A0TqbdH9FOuM5ZOVVH85YwceSa9wDgIKdpXzmBiE4YPhoQJsQk2tg MGDyaVwC9HmGQbX/7HtBgerf8X3MLIET+MDychZezvsXSQjJWIb0djpIBT++6KHE4cbC LvICOp+T3qRCV/x/q8BCUvxMZDAMBpwohLUlr6uozBT4Dd0jLnO72x31IUiIapV8aFIJ aBdw== Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org Hi, earlier me experienced problems by using atomic operations on=20 GNU/Linux. Are there functional tests out there me could run? The root=20 case is uncertain because there were known issues like unsigned long=20 overflow and concurrent read access. I'm developing a music sequencer and dealing often with threads. For no= w=20 me did a work-around using mutices. But me intend to use atomic=20 operations again because it makes more intuitive and simpler. http://gsequencer.org is hosted on GitHub as=20 https://github.com/weedlight/ags-devel =46or the grand picture the engine is running and me adjust dial widget= to=20 modify AgsPort field by atomic operations. At the moment me tries to bring 0.4.2 version to a successful end,=20 marked as stable. kind regards, Jo=C3=ABl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-progr= amming" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html