From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Graegert <graegerts@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Confusing Prototype
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:34:27 +0200
Message-ID: <6a00c8d505091311342f378eee@mail.gmail.com>
References: <432470B7.7050609@colannino.org> <dg3sd3$cd7$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <6a00c8d5050912093622607b44@mail.gmail.com>
	 <dg5im3$etc$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: graegerts@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <dg5im3$etc$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-c-programming-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: _z33 <timid.Gentoo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org

On 9/13/05, _z33 <timid.Gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Steve Graegert wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I do not fully agree.
> 
>    I knew I must have gone wrong somewhere ;-)

You haven't been wrong.  The assumptions you made are quite correct. 
I just disagreed on the fact that a pointer to the input buffer is
returned unconditionally.

Regards

	\Steve

--

Steve Graegert <graegerts@gmail.com>
Software Consultancy {C/C++ && Java && .NET}
Mobile: +49 (176)  21248869
Office: +49 (9131) 7126409