linux-c-programming.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Steve Graegert" <graegerts@gmail.com>
To: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux C Programming List <linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: include guards
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:09:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a00c8d50706200809i7f2f2d7aq9dfe073932535cc0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46720AFF.6070402@gmail.com>

Shriramana,

Please see inline.  Thanks.

On 6/15/07, Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> To prevent header files from being included more than once in the same
> translation unit, we use include guards like
>
> # ifndef FOO_H
> # define FOO_H
> ...
> # endif
>
> Recently I came to know that I can use simply:
>
> # pragma once
>
> instead of the above group of sentences and the desired effect is still
> accomplished.
>
> This leads me to think of two things:
>
> 1. why use the ifndef-define-endif method when the pragma once method is
> simpler and cleaner?

pragma(s) are, as most language extensions, not portable.

> 2. why should we need to use either method at all? If it is a
> universally undesirable behaviour that the same header file is included
> in a translation unit more than once, then an intelligent compiler (or
> preprocessor) itself can by default take of this, right?

Yes, if a header file is contained entirely in a `#ifndef'
conditional, then the preprocessor records that fact.  But if a
subsequent `#include' specifies the same file, and the macro in the
#ifndef is already defined, then the file is entirely skipped, without
even reading it.  How else should a preprossessor deal with this in a
portable manner?  Keep in mind that preprocessing is a distinct step
in the compilation process.

> I understand that to write portable code that compiles on
> not-so-intelligent compilers, we may need to do something manually, so
> question 2 is answered, but question 1 still stands...

Does it?  Correct, pragmas are not standard, and probably never will
be, due to the difficulty of specifying exactly what it is that
'#pragma once' is supposed to do. (Think of two identical copies of a
header file in different source directories, and a translation unit
that #includes both of them. What is the effect of '#pragma once'
here?)  Inclusion safe guards work perfectly well, are
standard-compliant and portable.

	\Steve

--

Steve Grägert <steve@graegert.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-c-programming" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-20 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-15  3:43 include guards Shriramana Sharma
2007-06-20 12:43 ` wwp
2007-06-20 15:09 ` Steve Graegert [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a00c8d50706200809i7f2f2d7aq9dfe073932535cc0@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=graegerts@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samjnaa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).