* Re: Segmentation fault
[not found] <1328439575.20020411104849@kgpa.ru>
@ 2002-04-16 19:29 ` Kurt Kehler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kurt Kehler @ 2002-04-16 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-c-programming
Oleg,
I'm adding this back in to the list.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Oleg O. Ossovitskii wrote:
> Which hardware do You use? Which system do You use (kernel, glibc)?
> Does Your computer has FPU ? Try specify switch to gcc, that talk
> them use FPU emulate library. Unfortunately I don't remember which
> switch You should use.
>
> I try use another compiler.
>
> P.S. sorry for my poor english
My hardware is a 200mhz Pentium MMX running Slackware 4.0 with kernel
2.2.6. dmesg reports "Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround
enabled." I'm not sure that is relevant. I tried several gcc
switches (-mno-486, -mno-fp-ret-in-387, -msoft-float) which didn't
work. When I added the -O2 switch to gcc and ran a.out under gdb
I got:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x40060607 in ldiv () from /lib/libc.so.5
What did work was booting Slackware 7.1 which uses egcs-2.91.66.
So there must be a problem with Slackware 4.0's libc5? I realize
it is time to switch to more recent software.
Thanks Oleg,
Kurt Kehler
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Segmentation fault
[not found] <20020411084352.65e693fe.subscript@free.fr>
@ 2002-04-16 19:30 ` Kurt Kehler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kurt Kehler @ 2002-04-16 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-c-programming
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, wwp wrote:
> It silently compiles and successfully runs for me (GNU/Linux x86;
> k2.4.18; gcc 2.95.3).
Thanks wwp for taking the time to do this.
Kurt Kehler
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Segmentation fault
[not found] <OF5DFD5B6D.7D47A4C9-ON65256B98.0022D8F5@pune.tcs.co.in>
@ 2002-04-16 19:30 ` Kurt Kehler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kurt Kehler @ 2002-04-16 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-c-programming
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Hemant Mohan wrote:
> I compiled this code with gcc-3.0.3 and ran it. It displays the output as:
>
> Easter in 2002 on 3/31
>
> There was no segmentation fault or any other messages. Attachment easter.c
> contains the source code with a small modification from yours. I only moved
> the #include <stdio.h> line before the definition of easter().
Hemant,
Thanks for taking the time to do this. Moving the #include <stdio.h> did
not prevent the segmentation fault.
Kurt Kehler
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-16 19:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1328439575.20020411104849@kgpa.ru>
2002-04-16 19:29 ` Segmentation fault Kurt Kehler
[not found] <20020411084352.65e693fe.subscript@free.fr>
2002-04-16 19:30 ` Kurt Kehler
[not found] <OF5DFD5B6D.7D47A4C9-ON65256B98.0022D8F5@pune.tcs.co.in>
2002-04-16 19:30 ` Kurt Kehler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).