From: soraberri <421246@posta.unizar.es>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: newby.-interpreting C
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:39:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cq9g4e$62u$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041220211709.GD2460@lug-owl.de>
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-20 20:07:54 +0100, soraberri <421246@posta.unizar.es>
> wrote in message <cq77vi$1ej$1@sea.gmane.org>:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Anyone could give me the meaning of this definition? Is the
>>__attribute__ stuff what scares me. If you feel like I'm too
>>desoriented, please tell me what should I know first.
>>
>>typedef struct {
>> uint8_t b[6];
>>} __attribute__((packed)) bdaddr_t;
>
>
> Compilers do use __attribute__ to allow programmers to modify the
> compiler's behavior in certain areas. "packed" tells the compiler to not
> start each variable at a natural alignment (ie. 4 bytes on a 32bit
> machine, 8 bytes on a 64bit machine). (That is, the address of a given
> variable must be a multiple of 4 (or 8) bytes.)
>
> A "packed" structure is usually used for two things:
>
> - In device drivers to fit a hardware device's memory-mapped
> register structure
> - In poorly written programs to store variables into on-disk
> files to be read back later on by other programs.
>
> General rule: if you don't *need* this for a good reason, or if you even
> don't know what it does, you don't need it, since it also introduces a
> performance penalty: CPUs tend to be fast at naturally aligned memory
> accesses, but quite slow on non-aligned accesses.
>
> MfG, JBG
>
All rigth, it has been very helpful, thank you very much
regards
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-21 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-20 19:07 newby.-interpreting C soraberri
2004-12-20 19:38 ` Nir Dremer
2004-12-20 21:17 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-12-21 15:39 ` soraberri [this message]
2004-12-30 11:26 ` Glynn Clements
2004-12-30 11:40 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='cq9g4e$62u$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=421246@posta.unizar.es \
--cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).