linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Lübbe" <jlu@pengutronix.de>
To: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com>
Cc: wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, swarren@wwwdotorg.org,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, anantgole@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: ti_hecc: fix rx wrong sequence issue
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:12:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349687547.3444.7.camel@coredoba.hi.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349678436-747-1-git-send-email-anilkumar@ti.com>

On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 12:10 +0530, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> Fix "received wrong sequence count. expected: x, got: y" errors
> reported by cansequence in a stress test (--verbose).

I tested this on a AM3505 with cansequence 4.0.6. For 500kbit, I see no
reordering anymore.

When testing at 1Mbit, it seems to be worse than before:
~ # ifconfig can0 down; canconfig can0 bitrate 1000000; ifconfig can0 up
can0 bitrate: 1000000, sample-point: 0.692
[ 1627.995574] ti_hecc ti_hecc: can0: setting CANBTC=0x3b
~ # cansequence -r -vv can0
interface = can0, family = 29, type = 3, proto = 1
received frame. sequence number: 0
received frame. sequence number: 1
received frame. sequence number: 2
received frame. sequence number: 3
received frame. sequence number: 4
received frame. sequence number: 5
received frame. sequence number: 6
received frame. sequence number: 7
received frame. sequence number: 8
received frame. sequence number: 9
received frame. sequence number: 10
received frame. sequence number: 11
received frame. sequence number: 12
received frame. sequence number: 13
received frame. sequence number: 14
received frame. sequence number: 15
received frame. sequence number: 16
received frame. sequence number: 17
received frame. sequence number: 18
received frame. sequence number: 19
received frame. sequence number: 20
received frame. sequence number: 21
received frame. sequence number: 21
received wrong sequence count. expected: 22, got: 21
received frame. sequence number: 21
received wrong sequence count. expected: 22, got: 21
received frame. sequence number: 22
received frame. sequence number: 22
received wrong sequence count. expected: 23, got: 22
received frame. sequence number: 23
received frame. sequence number: 23
received wrong sequence count. expected: 24, got: 23
received frame. sequence number: 24
received frame. sequence number: 24
received wrong sequence count. expected: 25, got: 24
received frame. sequence number: 24
received wrong sequence count. expected: 25, got: 24
received frame. sequence number: 25
received frame. sequence number: 25
received wrong sequence count. expected: 26, got: 25
received frame. sequence number: 26
received frame. sequence number: 27
received frame. sequence number: 27
received wrong sequence count. expected: 28, got: 27
received frame. sequence number: 28
received frame. sequence number: 28
received wrong sequence count. expected: 29, got: 28
received frame. sequence number: 28
received wrong sequence count. expected: 29, got: 28
received frame. sequence number: 29
...

Here we can see that after the initial frames, most frames are received
twice (some even thrice).

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-08  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08  6:40 [PATCH] can: ti_hecc: fix rx wrong sequence issue AnilKumar Ch
2012-10-08  9:12 ` Jan Lübbe [this message]
2012-10-11 12:01   ` Jan Lübbe
2012-10-08  9:28 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-05 11:34 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-11-05 13:47   ` AnilKumar, Chimata
2012-11-05 13:56     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-11-05 18:15   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-11-05 18:40     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-09-08 10:15       ` Jan Sondhauss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1349687547.3444.7.camel@coredoba.hi.pengutronix.de \
    --to=jlu@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=anantgole@ti.com \
    --cc=anilkumar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).