From: Ico Doornekamp <can@zevv.nl>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-can <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, yegorslists@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: CAN libpcap capture endianess
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:47:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378975140-sup-5236@pruts.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5231748A.2080009@pengutronix.de>
* On 2013-09-12 10:00:10 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> ...but your CAN frames don't look correct in wireshark. I suggest you
> bring up the command line tools and use candump to display the raw CAN
> frames. Raw CAN frames, as they enter the application, are in host
> order. To be precise the can_id is in host order, as all other members
> are u8. "data" is an array of 8 x u8, which is in fact big endian
> ordered, if you want to access it with 2x32 or 64 bit.
>
> > struct can_frame {
> > canid_t can_id; /* 32 bit CAN_ID + EFF/RTR/ERR flags */
> > __u8 can_dlc; /* frame payload length in byte (0 .. CAN_MAX_DLEN) */
> > __u8 data[CAN_MAX_DLEN] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> > };
I just did this. candump shows this:
slcan0 58A [8] 4B 12 20 04 D6 00 00 00
The raw data is shown in wireshark as
8a 05 00 00 08 00 00 00 4b 12 20 04 d6 00 00 00
The CAN dissector parses this as identifier 0x0a050000 with the
'extended' flag set , which seems to have the wrong endianess.
The CANopen dissector also interprets the identifier with wrong endian
order, and is thus not able to decode the rest of the packet.
If I'm not mistaking, both the CAN and CANopen dissector in wireshark
are thus assuming wrong endianess. I'll check the source and see if I
can come up with a proper patch for the wireshark team.
Thank you for your feedback,
Ico
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-11 17:42 CAN libpcap capture endianess Ico
2013-09-11 18:22 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-11 18:30 ` Ico Doornekamp
2013-09-11 18:38 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-11 18:53 ` Ico Doornekamp
2013-09-11 19:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2013-09-11 19:17 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2013-09-11 19:34 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-11 19:37 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-11 20:05 ` Ico Doornekamp
2013-09-11 20:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-12 6:52 ` Ico Doornekamp
2013-09-12 8:00 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-12 8:47 ` Ico Doornekamp [this message]
2013-09-12 8:52 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-12 9:09 ` Ico Doornekamp
2013-09-12 9:13 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-09-12 9:31 ` Ico Doornekamp
2016-05-10 19:25 ` Ico Doornekamp
2016-05-11 7:40 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <1462952665-sup-1016@pruts.nl>
2016-05-11 8:17 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2016-05-11 12:28 ` Ico Doornekamp
2016-05-11 13:25 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2016-05-11 17:01 ` Ico Doornekamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378975140-sup-5236@pruts.nl \
--to=can@zevv.nl \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=yegorslists@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).