From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Stein Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] c_can: add driver for the PCH CAN controller Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:27:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1626144.8BPv1GvbeG@ws-stein> References: <4F44E640.8010708@grandegger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from webbox1416.server-home.net ([77.236.96.61]:42626 "EHLO webbox1416.server-home.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751065Ab2BWI1S (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:27:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F44E640.8010708@grandegger.com> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Wolfgang Grandegger Cc: Linux-CAN , "bhupesh.sharma" , Tomoya MORINAGA Hello Wolfgang, Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2012, 13:57:36 schrieb Wolfgang Grandegger: > For maintenance reasons, this diver should replace the "pch_can" driver > sooner than later as it uses the same CAN controller core. I named it > "pch_pci". Maybe "pch_can" would be more appropriate (common). This > patch is for 2.6.39, but likely it applies fine also to more recent > versions of the Linux kernel. > > Alexander, Tomoya, or anybody else, it would be nice if you could test > this patch and give some feedback. Thanks. What is the current state of c_can? Are there known bugs/issues? Best regards, Alexander -- Dipl.-Inf. Alexander Stein SYS TEC electronic GmbH August-Bebel-Str. 29 D-07973 Greiz Tel: +49-3661-6279-0, Fax: +49-3661-6279-99 eMail: Alexander.Stein@systec-electronic.com Internet: http://www.systec-electronic.com Managing Director: Dipl.-Phys. Siegmar Schmidt Commercial registry: Amtsgericht Jena, HRB 205563