From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=74.125.82.53 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792895009; b=vqFYpARjZ9B9fr3FMD41ZDyhyMAnYbeIAB5rVE2CblYxZCdCuXdd4oeWNqau9OvMm3j+ AO+cjsygsJuvqRyFjxxEyCdGsYSQEKVR2X8icJwdncPgrB0A7L/mDrwdsezioIb7O5LaB CPj+X1J8pGVGFxEjp3bEagGGv2UCDCYadtQ3rCme03/i7hpWRfOIu4HyCF+E00MAqyejJ qYdTQqn8JiskP3joHWCNdZ0zdV9aTxFi3c2NpaKxu6ZKw5gw1w3tGpt98CtV7ZQVLrt25 GpgWoBBWyHghfbIWB2xJdkq4woKZaD01rUjOCV5TEyDEbFNkDXeYSc6EamAd88P9BTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792895009; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=8ivcDCD6sbT3HeyNxmBNTblO+eeeUzkaQd94WtAs7n4=; b=j5o7ztblhwrQkGwvG7dP65N0blsgcye8A45gPHdqss7hnF6rFy7YZQaXG1KDoTCDdEHF 3ngYY8TBEIQwBkUqIIGUWYy8I9k2oWXz+t9jox07ROuK2O8NIqjCYigK6iOUKGSyCx67Q CzN4afmzNOnIx7Vt/i93O4V1PcN8y+owCHHwD8qtaMZ6dTVQTtRGz0IimK0bvZ8wx5Ktm 0tqJp2Nz77U2+T72Q9YjdbnOvaoQ1WITqfb4IadzdhvpyxLKSSbFb6GK8aeBrIryt5Su9 ApBFq2bM5LPBa3/iAqAr96NTk8CMoHYj/7wro/mw2s5PDb99B9lrdMTlGKZ0yV7qFmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=KA6CYmBc; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=74.125.82.53 Received: from mail-dl1-f53.google.com (mail-dl1-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB43F606A31E for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2026 02:23:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org CB43F606A31E Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=KA6CYmBc Received: by mail-dl1-f53.google.com with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-16079d54c17so1058164c88.0 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 19:23:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792895008; x=1793499808; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=8ivcDCD6sbT3HeyNxmBNTblO+eeeUzkaQd94WtAs7n4=; b=KA6CYmBcqsQvC/HFX0T1GLe65+gfKI4HeyLvBOp2ra0ohuc30NDAPlPT3ZOK0Y4csF m399BDBg9cUw+07eP4ywoxkaPvZiGyR9gr9FRtxPmNmYsvEp2IZPWLpxGmIXNcgx0jC8 ctdDNw2lZCggf/ITO3oTzzfeLCaz0I6qAtDSaEHXt0Xi795KZmztElZYWhwlZenlLK09 yi1djcyDu5kgl91J6j6HiGeJdLQAY1Q9zhsbgbLDHTOI3QwtmgqS1TJeuL7TarkS/Bxi xvKphuigbmylaaLgL1T6+Px42KezjZ4WzddBA5QZXyVMLP65iC0KJfgngy5Vd32SHiip G9cQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792895008; x=1793499808; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=8ivcDCD6sbT3HeyNxmBNTblO+eeeUzkaQd94WtAs7n4=; b=HuAZF4Q1kA9jDPYlCmQvMnYf065q8NzFo2pK93ezD5VWIf3idY6o8qtO9sU44rhaIZ 2cXkNk/0jIwNp8zYlk1elpBdSetlMdJ/C2W2PF2y0JKrGqrpuJhfB9adidQyIT9kAB65 zrFszrI7SQm1+FsHnMdAxkd+0g/nk7qcGo1cth8DBDFngSxSsE/OCU+htG49+F0RtIp+ xrTnqzxoHjFslk4wJYhm+bYhy6dpdyDAJiIxwA1z0DyDmjgoIakU9uOYQAX7r95IXNUO F/i8IWjdCjt4ev5t+qe207HrZgKs0nhMEmjn5NlAXSsj1OMZoyVxJ61ijPjc+dEsGeMl 7waA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvByMc/0+6t3Z5RCx/2DrQnSAI7CrfFHO6etWaUd0HdiwgkB0Rsv5FfmdfdvpQOZTMiKqDg8y0morlXE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYIGDoNdX2xhmobLhoJEx2qo5xONThHVVkg7IDusTQ5dr8x2g6Y4 hI8ANlxcPrMGIlJG/ueRCtYC+fuOY32bYWvVkWqooPzwSnjr9XyRAZyO X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou3rDpFnflrFdx6WCu4CUsgJLZVjSsITLpSih8eLTML+qqlUBRUx44MVHGgp9oX OaUr9eDhmKeeBHZ/dojgyNjUVCpPxuA6odeLIQB2Q1BxzeMXYGK2uW+YQdh/J9uDDZQuIKJrHKh SQ0lgWe1X8aCgmETJfJSyWgJKJeVlTEDWhmz8Da1Zh6jno1icKCev3oEtuex/gvHnYqyJGJ/lzD l0s62H5zFQnVFOOAaAIjI19pkwpXk4OivVmM5G9wMnau70SG0NBCOlP+h2pcMZhtsozTIFl/ao1 FvCFmRhWG3uwYkQd9DstZqaLwOEgRvgn1qUsf8XuV5qYrJg/FrPorcp5tfmirkFedRzezpsB1SN B8DpA/YQZMIukLgkQPC54NJ0pEIftQso/ckJGplTqTWQzIdsrDs9Up4RhN982A+nmDU8pDGqKIQ sOMOkj8Y6UW7hk9D9YzT0cxEkbdXE7s7ggwiPD0sB4c1l2F2klMJjOXppDeM/k0xwBAxdxiVEgj BFzkmPirgFzk3OgGP8peHd1eZh7oAN0nK3UfXz+qDh3WWC4oB0ntGJ7z/O+opV7I3DZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:607:b0:15a:9834:73f2 with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-19937bb20afmr6922856c88.38.1792895007760; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 19:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.1.1] ([183.242.161.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a92af1059eb24-198a1bfaebfsm11547267c88.15.2026.10.24.19.23.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Oct 2026 19:23:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Chaosheng Qu To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , Vincent Mailhol , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] can: don't discard the platform_get_irq() error in probe Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 10:18:45 +0800 Message-ID: <179289472574.8393.12094085935716992853@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20261021133130.2cf75b3c@kernel.org> References: <20261021133130.2cf75b3c@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Jakub, You are right, and thanks for pointing it out -- the Cc came from my send script, not from `get_maintainer.pl`, and I have fixed the script so it can't happen again. To be explicit about what I am not doing: I am not resending. The patches already reached the people who matter, the CAN trees are the right path for them, and another copy in everyone's inbox would be exactly the noise you are asking me to stop making. This is just the acknowledgement. For the record, the same mistake went out in a second small series the same day (`can: slcan/can327: publish tty->disc_data only after register_candev()`, 2 patches). Both were sent to linux-can@ plus the per-file people from `get_maintainer.pl`; the extra Cc is gone from the script, so neither can repeat it. Sorry for the noise. Chaosheng