From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@eia.be>
Subject: Re: using can-j1939
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:36:52 +0100
Message-ID: <20111201133652.GC321@e-circ.dyndns.org>
References: <20111201105434.214940@gmx.net>
 <20111201115256.GB321@e-circ.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from gate.eia.be ([194.78.71.18]:21269 "EHLO mail.eia.be"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753938Ab1LANg5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-can@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:36:57 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111201115256.GB321@e-circ.dyndns.org>
Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-can.vger.kernel.org>
To: Wolfgang Wagner <wutz@unterderbruecke.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org

Wolfgang,

> Did you read Documentation/networking/can/j1939.txt from the can-j1939-modules?
In order to not overload you too much, can you (high-level) describe what
you're about to do?
* using dynamic address claiming vs. static addresses
* writing own programs vs. using some predefined cansend/candump.
* sending & receiving vs. receive only.
....

Kind regards,
Kurt Van Dijck