From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] include: Move includes copied from the Linux kernel into include/linux
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:53:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140121095337.GR25911@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DA7106.5000300@hartkopp.net>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:18:14PM +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 17.01.2014 21:36, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> >>
> >> https://gitorious.org/linux-can/can-modules
> > Is it a possibility to merge can-modules and can-utils?
>
> NO!
Did I hit another red button? If so I'm sorry, that was not my
intention.
> > Then there would
> > only a single instance of isotp.h be needed.
>
> NO!
?? If can-modules and can-utils were merged both the kernel module and
the userspace stuff could use the same header. I don't understand you
"NO!" here.
> [...]
I don't see a real reason here, but I read between the lines that you
prefer isotp to go into the kernel directly instead of into can-utils
first.
Anyhow, what I care for is to be able to package can-utils for Debian.
That's what I can do once the updated headers hit can-utils so IMO we
can stop arguing even if we don't agree 100%.
@Marc or Oliver: Can you please give me a ping as soon as the headers
hit your public repo. Thanks.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 16:12 [PATCH v5 1/5] License cleanup Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] include: Remove two unused header files Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] ioctl.h: drop unused header Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] isotp.h: add explicit license information Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] include/socketcan: prepare headers to be moved to include/linux Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 16:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] include: Move includes copied from the Linux kernel into include/linux Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-16 19:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-16 22:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-17 13:37 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-17 14:04 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-17 20:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-18 12:18 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21 9:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-01-21 9:59 ` Yegor Yefremov
2014-01-21 10:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-01-21 11:34 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21 11:37 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-01-21 11:51 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-01-21 12:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140121095337.GR25911@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).