Re: Bug#568303: can-utils Debian package

["Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>]

Hi Alexander, hi Adrian,

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:31:27AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 09:59 AM, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
> > I think you did not get clean with this or that's Uwe who mislead you.
> 
> Yep. I misunderstood Uwe. From his first comments it appeared to me
> that exactly that had happened. So, I apologize to you Alexander
> and take my statements back.
I also apologize to both of you, Alexander and Adrian. I wailed to
Adrian on irc that I'm unhappy with the package as is and bounced some
mails to him. I think I'm the major reason that Adrian got the details
wrong. Sorry. It's not always easy to communicate things properly on
irc, still more when you're peeved.

> > Those commented out overrides were left in rules file from my previous
> > experiments, and not needed anymore. And they have nothing with Uwe's
> > package, I believe.
> 
> Alright, thanks for the explanation.
> 
> > I can count all changes I took from his work:
> > Arch: linux-any (totally forget that SocketCAN is Linux specific)
> > Several strings in description field.
> > 
> > And that's all. =\
> 
> Ok, it appeared to me that the situation was the complete opposite of
> that, i.e. you took Uwe's work and put your name onto it.
That's how it felt to me, but technically that's wrong and most parts
were done by Alexander.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |