From: Andri Yngvason <andri.yngvason@marel.com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mkl@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] can: flexcan: Consolidate and unify state change handling
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:06:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141126110649.715.31413@shannon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5474EE9C.7030605@grandegger.com>
Quoting Wolfgang Grandegger (2014-11-25 21:03:24)
> On 09/26/2014 07:31 PM, Andri Yngvason wrote:
> > Replacing error state change handling with the new mechanism.
> >
> > Changes made since last proposal:
> > can: flexcan: improve rx/tx state recognition.
>
> Move below "---", please.
>
> > Note: Flexcan is problematic because there is no interrupt generated when
> > transitioning between error-active and error-passive. If the bus is
> > disconnected, there is no event that will trigger a napi poll, so the new state
> > will not be discovered until the bus is connected. This problem goes away if
> > berr-reporting is enabled, because then the ack-error takes care of it.
>
> Well, this is a known issue and should be addressed via platform data
> (using the FLEXCAN_HAS_BROKEN_ERR_STATE flags).
>
I thought that was about something else.
>
> >
> > Another problem is that if nothing is happening on the bus, when it's connected
> > again, we won't see the new state until someone transmits something on the bus.
> >
> > I'd say that these are minor issues because a "healthy" bus has traffic and the
> > "disconnected bus" issue has a work-around.
>
> Would be nice to do some tests on a more recent Flexcan core as well.
>
Isn't imx6 fairly recent?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andri Yngvason <andri.yngvason@marel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 101 +++++++++-------------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > index 60f86bd..e7dea64 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> > @@ -577,98 +577,30 @@ static int flexcan_poll_bus_err(struct net_device *dev, u32 reg_esr)
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > -static void do_state(struct net_device *dev,
> > - struct can_frame *cf, enum can_state new_state)
> > -{
> > - struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > - struct can_berr_counter bec;
> > -
> > - __flexcan_get_berr_counter(dev, &bec);
> > -
> > - switch (priv->can.state) {
> > - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE:
> > - /*
> > - * from: ERROR_ACTIVE
> > - * to : ERROR_WARNING, ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF
> > - * => : there was a warning int
> > - */
> > - if (new_state >= CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING &&
> > - new_state <= CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF) {
> > - netdev_dbg(dev, "Error Warning IRQ\n");
> > - priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++;
> > -
> > - cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> > - cf->data[1] = (bec.txerr > bec.rxerr) ?
> > - CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING :
> > - CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
> > - }
> > - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: /* fallthrough */
> > - /*
> > - * from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING
> > - * to : ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF
> > - * => : error passive int
> > - */
> > - if (new_state >= CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE &&
> > - new_state <= CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF) {
> > - netdev_dbg(dev, "Error Passive IRQ\n");
> > - priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
> > -
> > - cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> > - cf->data[1] = (bec.txerr > bec.rxerr) ?
> > - CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE :
> > - CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
> > - }
> > - break;
> > - case CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF:
> > - netdev_err(dev, "BUG! "
> > - "hardware recovered automatically from BUS_OFF\n");
> > - break;
> > - default:
> > - break;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* process state changes depending on the new state */
> > - switch (new_state) {
> > - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
> > - netdev_dbg(dev, "Error Warning\n");
> > - cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
> > - cf->data[1] = (bec.txerr > bec.rxerr) ?
> > - CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING :
> > - CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING;
> > - break;
> > - case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE:
> > - netdev_dbg(dev, "Error Active\n");
> > - cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT;
> > - cf->data[2] = CAN_ERR_PROT_ACTIVE;
> > - break;
> > - case CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF:
> > - cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_BUSOFF;
> > - can_bus_off(dev);
> > - break;
> > - default:
> > - break;
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > static int flexcan_poll_state(struct net_device *dev, u32 reg_esr)
> > {
> > struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > struct sk_buff *skb;
> > struct can_frame *cf;
> > - enum can_state new_state;
> > + enum can_state new_state = 0, rx_state = 0, tx_state = 0;
> > int flt;
> > + struct can_berr_counter bec;
> >
> > flt = reg_esr & FLEXCAN_ESR_FLT_CONF_MASK;
> > if (likely(flt == FLEXCAN_ESR_FLT_CONF_ACTIVE)) {
> > - if (likely(!(reg_esr & (FLEXCAN_ESR_TX_WRN |
> > - FLEXCAN_ESR_RX_WRN))))
> > - new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> > - else
> > - new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
> > - } else if (unlikely(flt == FLEXCAN_ESR_FLT_CONF_PASSIVE))
> > + tx_state = unlikely(reg_esr & FLEXCAN_ESR_TX_WRN) ?
> > + CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING : CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> > + rx_state = unlikely(reg_esr & FLEXCAN_ESR_RX_WRN) ?
> > + CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING : CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> > + new_state = max(tx_state, rx_state);
> > + } else if (unlikely(flt == FLEXCAN_ESR_FLT_CONF_PASSIVE)) {
> > + __flexcan_get_berr_counter(dev, &bec);
> > new_state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
> > - else
> > + rx_state = bec.rxerr >= bec.txerr ? new_state : 0;
> > + tx_state = bec.rxerr <= bec.txerr ? new_state : 0;
> > + } else {
> > new_state = CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF;
> > + }
> >
> > /* state hasn't changed */
> > if (likely(new_state == priv->can.state))
> > @@ -678,8 +610,11 @@ static int flexcan_poll_state(struct net_device *dev, u32 reg_esr)
> > if (unlikely(!skb))
> > return 0;
> >
> > - do_state(dev, cf, new_state);
> > - priv->can.state = new_state;
>
> On SJA1000 and MSCAN you use:
>
> if (new_state != priv->can.state) ...
>
That's because they had that before. I was trying not to make more changes than
were needed.
Also, this makes sense with regard to not feeding the frame if there was no
change.
>
> > + can_change_state(dev, cf, new_state, tx_state, rx_state);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(new_state == CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF))
> > + can_bus_off(dev);
> > +
> > netif_receive_skb(skb);
> >
> > dev->stats.rx_packets++;
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-26 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-26 17:31 [PATCH v3 4/4] can: flexcan: Consolidate and unify state change handling Andri Yngvason
2014-11-25 21:03 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2014-11-26 11:06 ` Andri Yngvason [this message]
2014-11-26 11:28 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141126110649.715.31413@shannon \
--to=andri.yngvason@marel.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).