linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] can: uapi: can.h: mark union inside struct can_frame packed
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:28:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322102814.402850-1-mkl@pengutronix.de> (raw)

In commit ea7800565a12 ("can: add optional DLC element to Classical
CAN frame structure") the struct can_frame::can_dlc was put into an
anonymous union with another u8 variable.

For various reasons some members in struct can_frame and canfd_frame
including the first 8 byes of data are expected to have the same
memory layout. This is enforced by a BUILD_BUG_ON check in af_can.c.

Since the above mentioned commit this check fails on at least one compiler
(arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0). Rong Chen analyzed the problem
and found that the union in struct can_frame takes 4 bytes instead of
the expected 1:

| struct can_frame {
|          canid_t                    can_id;               /* 0     4 */
|          union {
|                  __u8               len;                  /* 4     1 */
|                  __u8               can_dlc;              /* 4     1 */
|          };                                               /* 4     4 */
|          __u8                       __pad;                /* 8     1 */
|          __u8                       __res0;               /* 9     1 */
|          __u8                       len8_dlc;             /* 10     1 */
|
|          /* XXX 5 bytes hole, try to pack */
|
|          __u8                       data[8]
| __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /*    16     8 */
|
|          /* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */
|          /* sum members: 19, holes: 1, sum holes: 5 */
|          /* forced alignments: 1, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 5 */
|          /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
| } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));

Marking the union as packed fixes the problem.

Fixes: ea7800565a12 ("can: add optional DLC element to Classical CAN frame structure")
Suggested-by: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
---
 include/uapi/linux/can.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/can.h b/include/uapi/linux/can.h
index f75238ac6dce..9842bb55ffd9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/can.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/can.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct can_frame {
 		 */
 		__u8 len;
 		__u8 can_dlc; /* deprecated */
-	};
+	} __attribute__((packed));
 	__u8 __pad; /* padding */
 	__u8 __res0; /* reserved / padding */
 	__u8 len8_dlc; /* optional DLC for 8 byte payload length (9 .. 15) */
-- 
2.30.2



             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22 10:28 Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2021-03-22 16:27 ` [PATCH] can: uapi: can.h: mark union inside struct can_frame packed Oliver Hartkopp
2021-03-23  8:24   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-03-23  9:37     ` Rong Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210322102814.402850-1-mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).