From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
michael@amarulasolutions.com,
Amarula patchwork <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>,
Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@victronenergy.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] can: slcan: add support to set bit time register (btr)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:21:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727172101.iw3yiynni6feft4v@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABGWkvrmbQcCHdZ_ANb+_196d9HsAxAHc4QS94R19v5STHcbiA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2114 bytes --]
On 27.07.2022 17:55:10, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Hello Marc,
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 1:31 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 26.07.2022 23:02:16, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > > It allows to set the bit time register with tunable values.
> > > The setting can only be changed if the interface is down:
> > >
> > > ip link set dev can0 down
> > > ethtool --set-tunable can0 can-btr 0x31c
> > > ip link set dev can0 up
> >
> > As far as I understand, setting the btr is an alternative way to set the
> > bitrate, right?
>
> I thought of a non-standard bitrate or, in addition to the bitrate, the
> possibility of enabling some specific CAN controller options. Maybe Oliver
> could help us come up with the right answer.
>
> This is the the slcan source code:
> https://github.com/linux-can/can-utils/blob/cad1cecf1ca19277b5f5db39f8ef6f8ae426191d/slcand.c#L331
> btr case cames after speed but they don't seem to be considered alternative.
>
> > I don't like the idea of poking arbitrary values into a
> > hardware from user space.
>
> However this is already possible through the slcand and slcan_attach
> applications.
> Furthermore, the driver implements the LAWICEL ASCII protocol for CAN
> frame transport over serial lines,
> and this is one of the supported commands.
>
> >
> > Do you have a use case for this?
>
> I use the applications slcand and slcan_attach as a reference, I try to make the
> driver independent from them for what concerns the CAN setup. And the bit time
> register setting is the last dependency.
Ok - We avoided writing bit timing registers from user space into the
hardware for all existing drivers. If there isn't a specific use case,
let's skip this patch. If someone comes up with a use case we can think
of a proper solution.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-27 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-26 21:02 [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] can: slcan: extend supported features (step 2) Dario Binacchi
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/9] can: slcan: use KBUILD_MODNAME and define pr_fmt to replace hardcoded names Dario Binacchi
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] can: slcan: remove useless header inclusions Dario Binacchi
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/9] can: slcan: remove legacy infrastructure Dario Binacchi
2022-07-27 17:09 ` Max Staudt
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/9] can: slcan: change every `slc' occurrence in `slcan' Dario Binacchi
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/9] can: slcan: use the generic can_change_mtu() Dario Binacchi
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/9] can: slcan: add support for listen-only mode Dario Binacchi
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/9] ethtool: add support to get/set CAN bit time register Dario Binacchi
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] can: slcan: add support to set bit time register (btr) Dario Binacchi
2022-07-27 11:30 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-07-27 15:55 ` Dario Binacchi
2022-07-27 17:21 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2022-07-27 17:28 ` Dario Binacchi
2022-07-27 17:33 ` Max Staudt
2022-07-27 18:23 ` Dario Binacchi
2022-07-27 17:28 ` Max Staudt
2022-07-27 18:24 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-07-27 20:12 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2022-07-28 6:56 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-07-28 7:36 ` Dario Binacchi
2022-07-28 9:02 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-07-28 10:23 ` Dario Binacchi
2022-07-28 10:50 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-07-28 10:57 ` Max Staudt
2022-07-29 6:52 ` Dario Binacchi
2022-07-29 7:33 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-07-31 15:54 ` Dario Binacchi
2022-07-31 18:58 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-07-26 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3 9/9] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for the slcan driver Dario Binacchi
2022-07-27 18:31 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] can: slcan: extend supported features (step 2) Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220727172101.iw3yiynni6feft4v@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jhofstee@victronenergy.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=max@enpas.org \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox