From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Kopp" <thomas.kopp@microchip.com>,
"Stefan Althöfer" <Stefan.Althoefer@janztec.com>,
kernel@pengutroniux.de, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] can: mcp251xfd: implement workaround for double-RX erratum
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:20:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230111222042.1139027-6-mkl@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111222042.1139027-1-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
---
.../net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c | 1 +
drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---
drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
index cbfba958e3b5..f90a83390db2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ mcp251xfd_ring_init_rx(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv, u16 *base, u8 *fifo_nr)
int i, j;
mcp251xfd_for_each_rx_ring(priv, rx_ring, i) {
+ rx_ring->last_valid = timecounter_read(&priv->tc);
rx_ring->head = 0;
rx_ring->tail = 0;
rx_ring->base = *base;
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c
index 811c4487c6fe..b9c4f7148b53 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-rx.c
@@ -175,8 +175,6 @@ mcp251xfd_hw_rx_obj_to_skb(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
if (!(hw_rx_obj->flags & MCP251XFD_OBJ_FLAGS_RTR))
memcpy(cfd->data, hw_rx_obj->data, cfd->len);
-
- mcp251xfd_skb_set_timestamp_from_tbc(priv, skb, hw_rx_obj->ts);
}
static int
@@ -187,8 +185,21 @@ mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_one(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->ndev->stats;
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct canfd_frame *cfd;
+ u64 timestamp;
int err;
+ timestamp = timecounter_cyc2time(&priv->tc, hw_rx_obj->ts);
+ if (timestamp <= ring->last_valid ) {
+ netdev_dbg(priv->ndev, "%s: last_valid=0x%016llx ts=0x%016llx d=0x%016llx data=%*ph - Dropping\n", __func__,
+ ring->last_valid, timestamp,
+ timestamp - ring->last_valid,
+ 8, hw_rx_obj->data);
+ stats->rx_fifo_errors++;
+
+ return -EBADMSG;
+ }
+ ring->last_valid = timestamp;
+
if (hw_rx_obj->flags & MCP251XFD_OBJ_FLAGS_FDF)
skb = alloc_canfd_skb(priv->ndev, &cfd);
else
@@ -199,6 +210,7 @@ mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_one(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
return 0;
}
+ mcp251xfd_skb_set_timestamp(skb, timestamp);
mcp251xfd_hw_rx_obj_to_skb(priv, hw_rx_obj, skb);
err = can_rx_offload_queue_timestamp(&priv->offload, skb, hw_rx_obj->ts);
if (err)
@@ -281,7 +293,15 @@ mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_ring(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
err = mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_one(priv, ring,
(void *)hw_rx_obj +
i * ring->obj_size);
- if (err)
+ /* -EBADMSG means we're affected by an
+ * erratum, i.e. that timestamp in the RX
+ * object is older that the last valid
+ * received CAN frame. Don't process any
+ * further.
+ */
+ if (err == -EBADMSG)
+ return mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_ring_uinc(priv, ring, i);
+ else if (err)
return err;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
index 11f6e1c6fc60..d973a89cf7f8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd.h
@@ -546,6 +546,9 @@ struct mcp251xfd_rx_ring {
unsigned int head;
unsigned int tail;
+ /* timestamp of the last valid received CAN frame */
+ u64 last_valid;
+
u16 base;
u8 nr;
u8 fifo_nr;
--
2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-11 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 22:20 [PATCH 0/5] can: mcp251xfd: workaround double-RX erratum Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-11 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] can: mcp251xfd: setup cycle counter before mcp251xfd_ring_init() Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-11 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] can: mcp251xfd: introduce mcp251xfd_skb_set_timestamp_from_tbc() and make use of it Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-11 22:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_ring_uinc(): factor out in separate function Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-11 22:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] can: mcp251xfd: rx: mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_ring() Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-11 22:20 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2023-01-11 22:30 ` [PATCH 0/5] can: mcp251xfd: workaround double-RX erratum Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-12 7:54 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-13 12:39 ` AW: " Stefan Althöfer
2023-01-13 13:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-16 7:19 ` Thomas.Kopp
2023-01-25 5:41 ` Tom Evans
2023-01-25 6:59 ` Thomas.Kopp
2023-01-25 7:42 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-25 9:21 ` AW: " Stefan Althöfer
2023-01-16 8:43 ` Stefan Althöfer
2023-01-18 23:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-16 19:49 ` Stefan Althöfer
2023-01-16 22:15 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2023-01-19 7:47 ` AW: " Stefan Althöfer
2023-01-19 12:02 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230111222042.1139027-6-mkl@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=Stefan.Althoefer@janztec.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutroniux.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.kopp@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox