From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 361212EFD95; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768807641; cv=none; b=KwOxgXorrTJ5EtvrTBLUALMj4Z9OutlkMUYtMp48tu2XUk0b0zTzLau2NfD/yHSbCAZvZpWZR/C1L7S/2Of4nBJOPRLdB6RfynCiOFMdYN/ZF5LMBIdkRWR+ARoKYNvfTPpnt1+0DIR79Le2pir/geoXEC0y4MNLzXcBMqQLdUo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768807641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QrvvK8DwqAX5G1g3b1UVXsJAicOUBLZ7e9IhSG1K0sk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=h2G9wFWdALFhMJwWzUe5p3fp/d5e3/RHOVYfYRSRGvpHRD1wxiAS+ChcYxoSalKnE9Y8D/5ffOtQvWIoR4bwsSolarajs8EBeu5TeoPfkj6m7FVOfllh7/W573/xv6G9VHS2O9q4AgM/nvkvjir8+qLR3za9HgFstww0tyophSw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=AO8fZsm9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="AO8fZsm9" Received: from francesco-nb (248.201.173.83.static.wline.lns.sme.cust.swisscom.ch [83.173.201.248]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3AA682295F; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 08:17:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1768807078; bh=QrvvK8DwqAX5G1g3b1UVXsJAicOUBLZ7e9IhSG1K0sk=; h=From:To:Subject; b=AO8fZsm9YwxxOGFjr1ytGLZwS6mHPH/ZMaN5CDqGdE0mtZ3W0NcUffjkCO4EfyOyO Q40UYyDRJUIDjAry3ZxYdoCud0GxP/ufmqRFjlZdtJxOAUB62yXR3aHJVVUVdCZsHB 23uRSJwfXF82HLc3ns3l9J8jW+Vr4ljWnNWNxDnciXpiy8V7A1TUmhFXmb7DpBHTB6 r6XQWEkOhAKYbeCAAJP840sV9VDVNj/sLjp2HYnR382UnmnNsUrT9pqkeJhED8iEbZ 4nk6T32WUJHW43Zg5JL16IBRJLJzg/1Vnhk1VpmcRVeJeO9P1+qsif0tcSs75T8tix Z652yd92WFdrQ== Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 08:17:53 +0100 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Marc Kleine-Budde , Vincent Mailhol , Oliver Hartkopp Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 6.19.0-rc6 CAN regression Message-ID: <20260119071753.GA14836@francesco-nb> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello, there is some issue with CAN on the latest linux 6.19 RC, canfdtest fails with `send failed: Invalid argument` fails on various SoC (NXP i.MX8MP, i.MX8QM, i.MX6 ... and TI AM62 and maybe more). Is this known and already being addressed? I have seen some recent PR and patches, but I am not sure they are fixing this issue. Thanks, Francesco