From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/6] can: bcm: prevent thrtimer UAF in rx path by checking RX_NO_AUTOTIMER
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 15:12:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508151237.7d0a9105@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507112321.439968-3-mkl@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, 7 May 2026 10:22:24 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Commit f1b4e32aca08 ("can: bcm: use call_rcu() instead of costly
> synchronize_rcu()") removed the synchronize_rcu() call from
> bcm_delete_rx_op() and introduced the RX_NO_AUTOTIMER flag to prevent
> timers from being rearmed during deletion. However, it only applied
> this check to op->timer via bcm_rx_starttimer().
All AIs point out this is insufficient:
reader (bcm_rx_handler, RCU) | writer (bcm_delete_rx_op)
-----------------------------+-------------------------------
test op->flags (no AUTOTIMER)|
| op->flags |= RX_NO_AUTOTIMER
| bcm_remove_op()
| hrtimer_cancel(&op->thrtimer)
| /* not armed: no-op */
| call_rcu(bcm_free_op_rcu)
hrtimer_start(&op->thrtimer) |
return from RCU section |
| grace period elapses
| bcm_free_op_rcu() -> kfree(op)
thrtimer fires |
bcm_rx_thr_handler(op) | <-- UAF
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 8:22 [PATCH net 0/6] pull-request: can 2026-05-07 Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07 8:22 ` [PATCH net 1/6] can: raw: add locking for raw flags bitfield Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07 8:22 ` [PATCH net 2/6] can: bcm: prevent thrtimer UAF in rx path by checking RX_NO_AUTOTIMER Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-08 22:12 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-07 8:22 ` [PATCH net 3/6] can: j1939: fix wrong RX timeout for CTS hold messages Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07 8:22 ` [PATCH net 4/6] can: j1939: fix lockless local-destination check Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07 8:22 ` [PATCH net 5/6] can: peak: Modification of references to email accounts being deleted Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07 8:22 ` [PATCH net 6/6] can: flexcan: disable all IRQ lines in flexcan_chip_interrupts_enable() Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-08 22:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508151237.7d0a9105@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox