From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Dynetrex, Admin" <admin@dynetrex.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, peter_hong@fintek.com.tw,
mkl@pengutronix.de, mailhol@kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] can: usb: f81604: TX broken with "short int URB: 9 < 12"
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 07:59:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026070732-reformer-civil-a4d8@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A3834A07-5639-4779-844F-C5843DFC3928@dynetrex.com>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:46:00PM -0700, Dynetrex, Admin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found an issue with a patch applied to the can/usb/f81604 driver on 2026-02-23.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36ead57443146e6b730ce1f48ca3e9b17e19a3d2
>
> The patch added a check to make sure urb->actual_length is not less than sizeof(struct f81604_int_data). The issue is that the interrupt data from the device is 9 bytes, but sizeof(struct f81604_int_data) returns 12 because the struct is marked __aligned(4).
>
> This causes valid interrupt URBs to be rejected. After this patch, CAN frames no longer transmit successfully, while before the patch they transmitted without issue.
>
> Each transmit attempt logs the following in dmesg:
>
> f81604_read_int_callback: short int URB: 9 < 12
>
> Please consider either removing the __aligned(4) attribute from struct f81604_int_data, or using a constant for the actual wire packet length when checking urb->actual_length.
Please consider submitting a patch to resolve this issue so you get full
credit for the fix.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 5:46 [REGRESSION] can: usb: f81604: TX broken with "short int URB: 9 < 12" Dynetrex, Admin
2026-07-07 5:59 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026070732-reformer-civil-a4d8@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=admin@dynetrex.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=peter_hong@fintek.com.tw \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox