From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/10] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:48:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708154822.9F8F51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-bcm_fixes-v7-10-c78896b342e4@hartkopp.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Multiplexed or throttled CAN frames share a single global `rx_stamp` and `rx_ifindex`, which are overwritten by rejected or unrelated multiplex frames, causing metadata corruption when sending throttled frames to userspace.
--
--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v7 10/10] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() ---
commit 981b0672b1caa15044dae2fc2e2b6c5ccb8394f9
Author: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()
This commit moves the updates to op->rx_stamp and op->rx_ifindex inside
the bcm_rx_update_lock section to prevent data races. It also notes that
metadata is bundled correctly when running concurrently on different CPUs
for wildcard interface subscriptions.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260707145135.5BC831F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -805,6 +800,14 @@ static void bcm_rx_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
>
> spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_rx_update_lock);
>
> + /* save rx timestamp and originator for recvfrom() under lock.
> + * For an op subscribed on all interfaces (ifindex == 0)
> + * bcm_rx_handler() can run concurrently on different CPUs so
> + * the CAN content and the meta data must be bundled correctly.
> + */
> + op->rx_stamp = skb->tstamp;
> + op->rx_ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by updating op->rx_stamp and
op->rx_ifindex unconditionally here before checking the multiplex mask,
are we risking metadata corruption for throttled frames?
If a valid multiplexed frame is received and throttled, its payload is
buffered. If another frame with the same CAN ID but a non-matching
multiplex ID (or on a different interface) arrives while the throttle
timer is running, we reach this code and overwrite the global op->rx_stamp
and op->rx_ifindex.
When the timer later expires, bcm_rx_thr_flush() flushes all pending
throttled MUX frames using the shared overwritten metadata:
net/can/bcm.c:bcm_rx_thr_flush() {
...
for (i = 1; i < op->nframes; i++)
updated += bcm_rx_do_flush(op, i);
...
}
Which propagates to bcm_rx_changed():
net/can/bcm.c:bcm_rx_changed() {
...
bcm_send_to_user(op, &head, data, 1);
...
}
Could this cause applications to respond on the wrong CAN bus interface if
recvfrom() returns the incorrectly overwritten ifindex?
> if (op->flags & RX_FILTER_ID) {
> /* the easiest case */
> bcm_rx_update_and_send(op, op->last_frames, rxframe,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708-bcm_fixes-v7-0-c78896b342e4@hartkopp.net?part=10
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 15:21 [PATCH v7 00/10] can: bcm: collected fixes - final2 :-D Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] can: bcm: fix lockless bound/ifindex race and silent RX_SETUP failure Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:21 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 15:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708154822.9F8F51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox