Linux CAN drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 17:47:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708174739.7E1111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-bcm_fixes-v8-10-8c2f5f3bc212@hartkopp.net>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the patch fails to fully resolve the issue it claims to fix: Metadata mismatch for delayed/throttled CAN frames. `op->rx_stamp` and `op->rx_ifindex` are overwritten by subsequent frames, causing delayed frames to be delivered with incorrect timestamps and originator ifindexes.
--

--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v8 10/10] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() ---
commit 1903094034673eeaf05aa58b49f4d0ff45d06795
Author: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>

can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()

This commit addresses data races and torn stores on rx_stamp and rx_ifindex
by moving their assignment inside the bcm_rx_update_lock section in
bcm_rx_handler(). It ensures CAN content and metadata are bundled correctly.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260707145135.5BC831F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/

> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index 66dd8789843b5..1986d33a7d279 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -805,6 +800,14 @@ static void bcm_rx_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
>  
>  	spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_rx_update_lock);
>  
> +	/* save rx timestamp and originator for recvfrom() under lock.
> +	 * For an op subscribed on all interfaces (ifindex == 0)
> +	 * bcm_rx_handler() can run concurrently on different CPUs so
> +	 * the CAN content and the meta data must be bundled correctly.
> +	 */
> +	op->rx_stamp = skb->tstamp;
> +	op->rx_ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this fully resolve the
metadata mismatch for delayed or throttled CAN frames?

Since op->rx_stamp and op->rx_ifindex are unconditionally updated here, will
they overwrite the metadata corresponding to pending throttled frames?

If an application configures a BCM socket with a throttle timer (kt_ival2 > 0)
and a frame is marked for delayed delivery, a subsequent frame arriving before
the timer expires will overwrite this global metadata.

When the timer expires and the delayed frame is eventually flushed to user
space via bcm_send_to_user(), it will be sent with the clobbered
op->rx_ifindex rather than the interface it originally arrived on. Could this
lead to the user application receiving an incorrect source interface and
potentially responding on the wrong CAN bus?

> +
>  	if (op->flags & RX_FILTER_ID) {
>  		/* the easiest case */
>  		bcm_rx_update_and_send(op, op->last_frames, rxframe,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708-bcm_fixes-v8-0-8c2f5f3bc212@hartkopp.net?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 17:26 [PATCH v8 00/10] can: bcm: collected fixes - final3 :-/ Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:26 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 17:26 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] can: bcm: fix lockless bound/ifindex race and silent RX_SETUP failure Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:27 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-08 17:47   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 18:38     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-08 21:23 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] can: bcm: collected fixes - final3 :-/ Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708174739.7E1111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox