From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:44:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709204418.4BC731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709-bcm_fixes-v12-10-61c06291bf1c@hartkopp.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Delayed or multiplexed frames report the timestamp and ifindex of newer unchanged or unmatched frames instead of the actual frame being delivered.
--
--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v12 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() ---
commit f0e124b25a2c7cb08e57d4a9731711a9b77bf578
Author: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()
This commit fixes a data race by moving the assignments of op->rx_stamp and
op->rx_ifindex inside the bcm_rx_update_lock spinlock section. This ensures
concurrent writes on different CPUs do not tear the 64-bit timestamp.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260707145135.5BC831F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index fbf1cbb7c99fe..10a883b50fc63 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -815,6 +810,14 @@ static void bcm_rx_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
> traffic_flags |= RX_OWN;
> }
>
> + /* save rx timestamp and originator for recvfrom() under lock.
> + * For an op subscribed on all interfaces (ifindex == 0)
> + * bcm_rx_handler() can run concurrently on different CPUs so
> + * the CAN content and the meta data must be bundled correctly.
> + */
> + op->rx_stamp = skb->tstamp;
> + op->rx_ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does unconditionally overwriting the
metadata here decouple the payload from its true origin?
If a frame matches the CAN ID but fails the MUX filter later in this
function (or has an unchanged payload when using a throttle timer), it is
ignored. However, the rx_stamp and rx_ifindex fields are still updated.
Later, when the throttle timer flushes the pending frame via
bcm_send_to_user(), could it deliver the pending payload using the corrupted
metadata of the ignored frame instead of the actual frame being sent?
> if (op->flags & RX_FILTER_ID) {
> /* the easiest case */
> bcm_rx_update_and_send(op, op->last_frames, rxframe,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709-bcm_fixes-v12-0-61c06291bf1c@hartkopp.net?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 20:22 [PATCH v12 00/11] can: bcm: collected fixes - final7 \o/ \o/ Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] can: bcm: fix lockless bound/ifindex race and silent RX_SETUP failure Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-10 0:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] can: bcm: track a single source interface for ANYDEV timeout/throttle ops Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709204418.4BC731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox