Linux CAN drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:44:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709204418.4BC731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709-bcm_fixes-v12-10-61c06291bf1c@hartkopp.net>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Delayed or multiplexed frames report the timestamp and ifindex of newer unchanged or unmatched frames instead of the actual frame being delivered.
--

--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v12 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() ---
commit f0e124b25a2c7cb08e57d4a9731711a9b77bf578
Author: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>

can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler()

This commit fixes a data race by moving the assignments of op->rx_stamp and
op->rx_ifindex inside the bcm_rx_update_lock spinlock section. This ensures
concurrent writes on different CPUs do not tear the 64-bit timestamp.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260707145135.5BC831F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/

> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index fbf1cbb7c99fe..10a883b50fc63 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -815,6 +810,14 @@ static void bcm_rx_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
>  			traffic_flags |= RX_OWN;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* save rx timestamp and originator for recvfrom() under lock.
> +	 * For an op subscribed on all interfaces (ifindex == 0)
> +	 * bcm_rx_handler() can run concurrently on different CPUs so
> +	 * the CAN content and the meta data must be bundled correctly.
> +	 */
> +	op->rx_stamp = skb->tstamp;
> +	op->rx_ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex;
> +

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does unconditionally overwriting the
metadata here decouple the payload from its true origin?

If a frame matches the CAN ID but fails the MUX filter later in this
function (or has an unchanged payload when using a throttle timer), it is
ignored. However, the rx_stamp and rx_ifindex fields are still updated.

Later, when the throttle timer flushes the pending frame via
bcm_send_to_user(), could it deliver the pending payload using the corrupted
metadata of the ignored frame instead of the actual frame being sent?

>  	if (op->flags & RX_FILTER_ID) {
>  		/* the easiest case */
>  		bcm_rx_update_and_send(op, op->last_frames, rxframe,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709-bcm_fixes-v12-0-61c06291bf1c@hartkopp.net?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 20:22 [PATCH v12 00/11] can: bcm: collected fixes - final7 \o/ \o/ Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] can: bcm: fix lockless bound/ifindex race and silent RX_SETUP failure Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-10  0:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 20:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 20:22 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] can: bcm: track a single source interface for ANYDEV timeout/throttle ops Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709204418.4BC731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox