Linux CAN drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration.
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 21:34:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260712213422.DB1111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260712212113.181121-1-kuniyu@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The patch calls the undefined function `unregister_netdevice_queue_net()`, resulting in a compilation error.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1] vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration. ---
commit 882fcd31630d9ce6b0a57cc99738c2ad0579763f
Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>

vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration.

This commit updates vxcan_dellink() to unregister local and peer devices
safely across different namespaces by using xchg(). The change aims to
prevent double-queuing of device destruction when RTNL is removed.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> --- a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -281,24 +284,25 @@ static int vxcan_newlink(struct net_device *dev,
>  
>  static void vxcan_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
>  {

[ ... ]

>  	unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
>  
> -	if (peer) {
> -		priv = netdev_priv(peer);
> -		RCU_INIT_POINTER(priv->peer, NULL);
> -		unregister_netdevice_queue(peer, head);
> -	}
> +	priv = netdev_priv(peer);
> +	dev = unrcu_pointer(xchg(&priv->peer, NULL));
> +	if (dev)
> +		unregister_netdevice_queue_net(dev_net(dev), peer, head);

[Severity: Low]
Is this missing a prerequisite patch? It appears that
unregister_netdevice_queue_net() is not defined anywhere in the kernel
tree, which leads to a compilation error when building vxcan.c.

> +
> +	netdev_put(peer, peer_tracker);
> +	netdev_put(dev, &priv->peer_tracker);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260712212113.181121-1-kuniyu@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-12 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-12 21:21 [PATCH v1] vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-12 21:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-13  7:56   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-14  9:30     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260712213422.DB1111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox