Linux CAN drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
	"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1] vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration.
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:31:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731233136.A908F1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731231755.2474376-1-kuniyu@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The patch calls a non-existent function `unregister_netdevice_queue_net()`, causing a build failure.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH RESEND v1] vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration. ---
commit aa743c4ffeab7ce1e07d36aa7e401187541f6f4f
Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>

vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration.

This commit modifies vxcan_dellink() to support concurrent per-netns device
unregistration by using xchg() to ensure each device is queued for
destruction only once. It drops the synchronous RTNL assumption for deleting
both the local and peer devices.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> index e882250180ef6..b7efed1226d88 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -281,24 +284,25 @@ static int vxcan_newlink(struct net_device *dev,
>  
>  static void vxcan_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
>  {
[ ... ]
> -	if (peer) {
> -		priv = netdev_priv(peer);
> -		RCU_INIT_POINTER(priv->peer, NULL);
> -		unregister_netdevice_queue(peer, head);
> -	}
> +	priv = netdev_priv(peer);
> +	dev = unrcu_pointer(xchg(&priv->peer, NULL));
> +	if (dev)
> +		unregister_netdevice_queue_net(dev_net(dev), peer, head);

[Severity: Low]
Does unregister_netdevice_queue_net() exist in the source tree? It appears
this will cause a build failure due to an undefined function reference when
the driver is compiled.

> +
> +	netdev_put(peer, peer_tracker);
> +	netdev_put(dev, &priv->peer_tracker);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731231755.2474376-1-kuniyu@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 23:17 [PATCH RESEND v1] vxcan: Support per-netns device unregistration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-31 23:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-31 23:33   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731233136.A908F1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox