From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yiran Qiu" <eritque-arcus@ikuyo.dev>
Cc: "Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: esd_usb: validate received message length before use
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:16:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814181617.4E6B61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815-can-esd-hydra-fixes-v1-1-de644cbeaec2@ikuyo.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unvalidated interface count from device causes heap buffer overflow during probe.
- [High] Dereferencing uninitialized network interfaces from USB messages causes kernel panic.
- [High] Spurious TX_DONE messages decrement inactive contexts causing active_tx_jobs underflow.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] can: esd_usb: validate received message length before use ---
commit 38efd7f38912ccfd78688896fcdf77da350528fd
Author: Yiran Qiu <eritque-arcus@ikuyo.dev>
Date: Fri Aug 14 18:05:46 2026 +0000
can: esd_usb: validate received message length before use
esd_usb_read_bulk_callback() walks a sequence of variable-length
messages out of the RX URB buffer. The only length check,
"pos > urb->actual_length", runs *after* the current message has been
dispatched and after @pos has been advanced, so it can neither protect
the message being processed nor stop the loop:
Validate the header and the declared message length before dispatch:
reject a message whose header is not fully present, whose length is
zero, or which extends past the received data, and advance @pos by the
validated length. Pass the validated length to the message handlers so
they can confirm that the fields they read (and the payload they copy)
were actually received.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
> index f41d4a0d140f7..13356e68f3f60 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/esd_usb.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -455,7 +479,7 @@ static void esd_usb_rx_can_msg(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
> }
>
> static void esd_usb_tx_done_msg(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
> - union esd_usb_msg *msg)
> + union esd_usb_msg *msg, unsigned int msg_len)
> {
> struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->netdev->stats;
> struct net_device *netdev = priv->netdev;
> @@ -464,6 +488,9 @@ static void esd_usb_tx_done_msg(struct esd_usb_net_priv *priv,
> if (!netif_device_present(netdev))
> return;
>
> + if (msg_len < offsetofend(struct esd_usb_tx_done_msg, hnd))
> + return;
> +
> context = &priv->tx_contexts[msg->txdone.hnd & (ESD_USB_MAX_TX_URBS - 1)];
>
> if (!msg->txdone.status) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can spurious TX_DONE messages decrement
inactive contexts and cause the active_tx_jobs counter to underflow?
In esd_usb_tx_done_msg(), the context identified by msg->txdone.hnd is accessed
without checking if it is actually active (e.g. echo_index !=
ESD_USB_MAX_TX_URBS). If a malicious device sends spurious TX_DONE messages,
this will unconditionally execute atomic_dec(&priv->active_tx_jobs).
When the queue eventually fills up with real packets, esd_usb_start_xmit()
won't stop the queue because active_tx_jobs is negative, returning
NETDEV_TX_BUSY. Returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY without stopping the queue causes the
network stack to infinitely retry, softlocking the CPU.
[ ... ]
> @@ -507,8 +534,27 @@ static void esd_usb_read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
>
> while (pos < urb->actual_length) {
> union esd_usb_msg *msg;
> + unsigned int msg_len;
> +
> + /* The header must be fully present before hdr.len / hdr.cmd
> + * (and the net index below) are read.
> + */
> + if (pos + sizeof(struct esd_usb_header_msg) > urb->actual_length) {
> + dev_err(dev->udev->dev.parent, "format error\n");
> + break;
> + }
>
> msg = (union esd_usb_msg *)(urb->transfer_buffer + pos);
> + msg_len = msg->hdr.len * sizeof(u32); /* convert to # of bytes */
> +
> + /* A zero-length message would never advance @pos and would
> + * spin this URB-completion softirq forever; a message must
> + * also fit within the received data.
> + */
> + if (msg->hdr.len == 0 || msg_len > urb->actual_length - pos) {
> + dev_err(dev->udev->dev.parent, "format error\n");
> + break;
> + }
>
> switch (msg->hdr.cmd) {
> case ESD_USB_CMD_CAN_RX:
> @@ -517,7 +563,7 @@ static void esd_usb_read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
> break;
> }
>
> - esd_usb_rx_can_msg(dev->nets[msg->rx.net], msg);
> + esd_usb_rx_can_msg(dev->nets[msg->rx.net], msg, msg_len);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this loop properly handle
uninitialized network interfaces?
If esd_usb_probe_one_net() fails for one of the interfaces during
esd_usb_probe(), it leaves dev->nets[index] as NULL. A malicious USB device can
then send ESD_USB_CMD_CAN_RX messages with the index of the failed interface,
which is passed unconditionally to esd_usb_rx_can_msg() resulting in a NULL
pointer dereference.
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does msg->rx.net >= dev->net_count
properly protect against out-of-bounds array access for dev->nets[]?
A malicious USB device can return an arbitrarily large number of interfaces in
the version reply message. In esd_usb_probe(), this is directly assigned to
dev->net_count without validating it against ESD_USB_MAX_NETS (2), which can
corrupt adjacent heap memory when writing to dev->nets[index]. Furthermore,
since dev->net_count can be larger than ESD_USB_MAX_NETS, the check
msg->rx.net >= dev->net_count above does not prevent dev->nets[msg->rx.net]
from going out of bounds here.
> break;
>
> case ESD_USB_CMD_CAN_TX:
> @@ -527,16 +573,11 @@ static void esd_usb_read_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
> }
>
> esd_usb_tx_done_msg(dev->nets[msg->txdone.net],
> - msg);
> + msg, msg_len);
> break;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260815-can-esd-hydra-fixes-v1-0-de644cbeaec2@ikuyo.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 18:05 [PATCH 0/2] can: fix two missed siblings of the kvaser_usb_leaf receive-walk fix Yiran Qiu
2026-08-14 18:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] can: esd_usb: validate received message length before use Yiran Qiu
2026-08-14 18:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 18:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] can: kvaser_usb_hydra: reject too-short commands in the receive path Yiran Qiu
2026-08-14 18:21 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814181617.4E6B61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eritque-arcus@ikuyo.dev \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox