From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA77425891; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787738070; cv=none; b=QYvRLruc0jZ8z1ior2bQ2CTzIM1KhqGgo0T4g8JUT3goUznNPO/4wCueKNndg1sWI3U9mDTP0jwMb9toOtQR+hEKrE05E06RVMBnf4OGSKat61V3fi7vo7oJZz8hzuEyslyDwgBQKcNa2VOJy4N0bsFmpCqkBCFRTUQxFyTbpXo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787738070; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cxBgEzmehlG9CsxGajfqjeHN9H6tt+rUzRThgZ2GrDc=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=R4dqbnsRsTmz54ZD+lfgZ2EP6u/D5cz8Ct3dsB9+0e2LnLSJgAlc6v24i0HlBRtnRIxjWARgvbIv5i/KbVnbJLZYDzukQEVrXUyjT0SGFrAHGxq/EJrsXpOMQ2pGVGQMhoJl6kqlQTJTs8/7jMPVWxQzUCXoc6/4YXqUOEk5Zng= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AR31seH+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AR31seH+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26C941F00A3E; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:54:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787738068; bh=cxBgEzmehlG9CsxGajfqjeHN9H6tt+rUzRThgZ2GrDc=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=AR31seH+ywIps89vZ6zCNL54bukm5MK/lZMNaMd+mQXX1+N7RzmN8bPPoWuK7gyFQ Vt8Urf7+yH4uG6qk0E4FGlKtOA05Qpimw8Tp7n/4Nlu5oxnSDr9pUSUQjsS9ALpwki mNtZeFrKPv1LM79NP1/5E/eiFkqmDgod72r4nZuO1dsVyuMQ8mSiwx/MCbjU8p3Vhh kgHkP1fdh3edPU79rcRMQ068/S6hwTNhOj36Z6JqWF/31z/GTEhrBCwdJjkmdMTEfP HssChQ9Y5/RONWc/4UJfRUHvU+nPRIRTgItR4IJMoDH43QtiNIhY3SL+xMCOcqb8ll gbycbeCh4VrVg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] soreuseport: publish num_socks with acquire/release Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Jinjie Ruan" Cc: "Oleksij Rempel" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Vincent Mailhol" , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, "Marc Kleine-Budde" , "Oliver Hartkopp" In-Reply-To: <20260825095422.3166067-9-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20260825095422.3166067-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20260825095422.3166067-9-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:54:27 +0000 Message-Id: <20260826095428.26C941F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Replace the smp_wmb()/smp_rmb() barrier pair with > smp_store_release()/smp_load_acquire() on reuse->num_socks. > Writers publish socks[] updates via release before incrementing > or decrementing the count; readers acquire the count before > accessing socks[], ensuring they observe a consistent view. >=20 > The detach path gains proper ordering between the socks[] write and > the decrement, which was previously unordered. >=20 > No functional change intended. >=20 > Assisted-by: DeepSeek:DeepSeek-V3 > Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825095422.3166= 067-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com?part=3D8