From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea+renesas@tuxon.dev>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
conor+dt@kernel.org, "Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, "Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3S
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:30:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902143013.D70171F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902141544.565763-6-claudiu.beznea+renesas@tuxon.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Lack of validation for Classical CAN mode on CAN FD-only hardware.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Dangling pointer in global array leads to double free when register_candev fails.
--
commit 1c2240055c546ef67856ad4716f6c425dbce01c6
Author: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3S
This commit adds support for the Renesas RZ/G3S CAN-FD controller.
The RZ/G3S controller supports two channels, 16 AFL pages, and operates
exclusively in CAN-FD mode.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> index bed7cde1aa01b..48e0573a73a44 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -661,6 +661,26 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info rzg2l_hw_info = {
> .fixed_canfd = 0,
> };
>
> +static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info r9a08g045_hw_info = {
> + .nom_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen4_nom_bittiming_const,
> + .data_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen4_data_bittiming_const,
> + .tdc_const = &rcar_canfd_gen4_tdc_const,
> + .regs = &rcar_gen4_regs,
> + .sh = &rcar_gen4_shift_data,
> + .rnc_field_width = 16,
> + .max_aflpn = 15,
> + .max_cftml = 31,
> + .max_channels = 2,
> + .postdiv = 2,
> + .shared_global_irqs = 0,
> + .multi_channel_irqs = 1,
> + .ch_interface_mode = 1,
> + .shared_can_regs = 1,
> + .external_clk = 1,
> + .fcan_pclk = 1,
> + .fixed_canfd = 1,
[Severity: High]
If the device tree specifies the "renesas,no-can-fd" property, could this
lead to a silent mismatch between the software network stack configuration
and the hardware state?
In drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c:rcar_canfd_probe(), if the property is
present, the driver will set fdmode = false:
if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "renesas,no-can-fd"))
fdmode = false;
However, when rcar_canfd_configure_controller() runs, it skips the
controller mode update because fixed_canfd is true:
if (gpriv->info->fixed_canfd)
continue;
This effectively leaves the hardware locked in CAN FD mode, while the rest of
the driver initializes the software stack for Classical CAN. For example,
rcar_canfd_channel_probe() initializes a max MTU of 16 bytes, and
rcar_canfd_configure_rx() restricts the physical hardware Rx FIFO payload
size to 8 bytes.
If the hardware receives a 64-byte CAN FD frame, will it attempt to write
64 bytes into an Rx FIFO configured for 8 bytes, causing a buffer overflow?
> +};
> +
[ ... ]
> @@ -2383,6 +2403,7 @@ static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rcar_canfd_pm_ops, rcar_canfd_suspend,
>
> static const __maybe_unused struct of_device_id rcar_canfd_of_table[] = {
> { .compatible = "renesas,r8a779a0-canfd", .data = &rcar_gen4_hw_info },
> + { .compatible = "renesas,r9a08g045-canfd", .data = &r9a08g045_hw_info },
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does probe failure on this newly added
hardware expose a potential double-free?
In drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c:rcar_canfd_channel_probe(), the global
array is populated before device registration:
gpriv->ch[priv->channel] = priv;
...
err = register_candev(ndev);
if (err) {
...
goto fail_candev;
}
If register_candev() fails, the error path calls free_candev(ndev), which
also frees the embedded priv structure, but leaves the dangling pointer in
gpriv->ch[priv->channel].
When the failure propagates back to rcar_canfd_probe(), the cleanup block
iterates over all configured channels and calls rcar_canfd_channel_remove()
for each, including the one that just failed:
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c:rcar_canfd_channel_remove() {
...
unregister_candev(priv->ndev);
...
free_candev(priv->ndev);
}
Could this lead to memory corruption when it attempts to unregister and free
the already freed dangling pointer?
> { .compatible = "renesas,r9a09g047-canfd", .data = &r9a09g047_hw_info },
> { .compatible = "renesas,r9a09g077-canfd", .data = &r9a09g077_hw_info },
> { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd", .data = &rcar_gen3_hw_info },
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902141544.565763-1-claudiu.beznea+renesas@tuxon.dev?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 14:15 [PATCH v4 0/7] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3S Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/G3S SoC Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] can: rcar_canfd: Fix typos in macro names Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] can: rcar_canfd: Allow the CAN FD clock to be sourced from fck Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] can: rcar_canfd: Do not set registers selecting the CAN mode Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 12:37 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3S Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 12:32 ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g045: Add CAN-FD node Claudiu Beznea
2026-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg3s-smarc: Enable CAN-FD Claudiu Beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902143013.D70171F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea+renesas@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).