From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhu Ling" <zhuling0805@qq.com>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] can: netlink: fix IFLA_CAN_BITRATE_MAX attribute sizing
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 16:28:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904162848.5831E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_D1C873B86B0E92011A264B0E196B911D5308@qq.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing netlink payload size underestimation in `can_pwm_get_size()` when PWM capabilities exist but `CAN_CTRLMODE_XL_TMS` is disabled, leading to `-EMSGSIZE` when filling the response.
--
commit 9a3cf7f66d6ea7a9d4aba48ff7c5376d72db7fe3
Author: Zhu Ling <zhuling0805@qq.com>
can: netlink: fix IFLA_CAN_BITRATE_MAX attribute sizing
This commit fixes an issue in can_get_size() where the size for
IFLA_CAN_BITRATE_MAX was missing the netlink attribute header overhead. By
using nla_total_size(), it prevents -EMSGSIZE errors when the skb has no slack
left.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c b/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c
> index 766d455950f55..ba26c61a82c2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c
> @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static size_t can_get_size(const struct net_device *dev)
> if (priv->bitrate_const) /* IFLA_CAN_BITRATE_CONST */
> size += nla_total_size(sizeof(*priv->bitrate_const) *
> priv->bitrate_const_cnt);
> - size += sizeof(priv->bitrate_max); /* IFLA_CAN_BITRATE_MAX */
> + size += nla_total_size(sizeof(priv->bitrate_max)); /* IFLA_CAN_BITRATE_MAX */
> size += can_ctrlmode_ext_get_size(); /* IFLA_CAN_CTRLMODE_EXT */
>
> size += can_data_bittiming_get_size(&priv->fd,
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while looking at
can_get_size(), I noticed another potential size underestimation just below
this diff in can_pwm_get_size():
drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c:can_pwm_get_size() {
if (!pwm_const || !pwm_on)
return 0;
...
}
If a CAN interface has hardware PWM support (pwm_const is non-NULL) but PWM is
currently disabled (pwm_on is false), can_pwm_get_size() returns 0.
However, can_pwm_fill_info() only checks pwm_const:
drivers/net/can/dev/netlink.c:can_pwm_fill_info() {
if (!pwm_const)
return 0;
nest = nla_nest_start(skb, IFLA_CAN_XL_PWM);
...
}
Could this mismatch cause can_pwm_fill_info() to write 52 bytes that were not
accounted for by can_get_size() when CAN_CTRLMODE_XL_TMS is disabled?
If so, could this also overflow the skb and cause nla_put() to fail with
-EMSGSIZE, breaking interface notifications and queries like 'ip link show'
for such devices?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/tencent_D1C873B86B0E92011A264B0E196B911D5308@qq.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 16:20 [PATCH net] can: netlink: fix IFLA_CAN_BITRATE_MAX attribute sizing Zhu Ling
2026-09-04 16:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 17:10 ` zhuling0805
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904162848.5831E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=zhuling0805@qq.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox