From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/11] pull-request: can-next 2026-10-21
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:56:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261021135631.7c9884eb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37e1db71-eaeb-40ab-8589-099f9d5611d9@hartkopp.net>
On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:33:38 +0200 Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> the original PR is pull-request: can-next 2026-10-18
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20261018164417.1540449-1-mkl@pengutronix.de/
>
> and I had to fix some sashiko-bots reports that didn't show up in
> previous postings on the CAN mailing list and its LMM.
>
> So its really just a fixes version of can-next 2026-10-18.
Right, looks like fixes mostly. Could you please quickly look over
the feedback on patch 11?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 10:24 [PATCH net-next 0/11] pull-request: can-next 2026-10-21 Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] can: dev: can_dropped_invalid_skb: drop CAN XL frames on non-CAN XL devices Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:33 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] can: skb: make echo skb freeing safe in any IRQ context Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] can: raw: remove redundant NULL check before netdev_hold() Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] can: skb: make CAN skb allocation failure paths IRQ-safe Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] can: isotp: check the frame type, not just the length Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] can: proc: reset pkg_stats atomics individually Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] can: proc: skip stats calculation after reset in can_stat_update() Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] can: replace ARPHRD_CAN type checks with can_get_ml_priv() Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] can: dev: can_put_echo_skb(): free skb on invalid echo index Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 10:24 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] can: protect the receive lists with a per-device lock Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 20:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-21 21:59 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-21 23:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 23:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-21 23:13 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-21 11:19 ` [PATCH net-next 0/11] pull-request: can-next 2026-10-21 Paolo Abeni
2026-10-21 11:33 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-21 20:56 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-10-21 21:32 ` Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261021135631.7c9884eb@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox