From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Stein Subject: Re: c_can: wrong frame order reception Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 07:57:16 +0200 Message-ID: <2275726.4ik4KABhfi@ws-stein> References: <2323199.vffRdFDsB5@ws-stein> <7234338.9RqiOdiLOY@ws-stein> <533B067A.3030609@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from webbox1416.server-home.net ([77.236.96.61]:32842 "EHLO webbox1416.server-home.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756616AbaDBF6b (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 01:58:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <533B067A.3030609@hartkopp.net> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde Hello Oliver, On Tuesday 01 April 2014 20:33:30, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > don't know if you monitored the patch set which was posted by Thomas Gleixner: > > There was one patch "c_can: Make it SMP safe" > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=139516364829052&w=2 > > which addressed some issues, you obviously fixed with your below patch too. > > Your patch below additionally implements the PCH_CAN support for C_CAN. > > Can you please check, if the patchset from Thomas which is available here > > tag 'linux-can-fixes-for-3.15-20140401' > in https://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can > > fixes the frame order reception in your setup too - and if so, sent a rebased > patch for the PCH_CAN support? Yep, I've seen that. I've already picked those patches and rebased eg20t support on v3.14. Testing of those is already enqueued, but it got delayed due to some other problems. Best regards, Alexander -- Dipl.-Inf. Alexander Stein SYS TEC electronic GmbH Am Windrad 2 08468 Heinsdorfergrund Tel.: 03765 38600-1156 Fax: 03765 38600-4100 Email: alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com Website: www.systec-electronic.com Managing Director: Dipl.-Phys. Siegmar Schmidt Commercial registry: Amtsgericht Chemnitz, HRB 28082