From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Subject: Re: Using sja1000_isa on a 64b system Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:36:51 +0100 Message-ID: <4EC25CE3.4000404@grandegger.com> References: <4E653775.4030503@grandegger.com> <4EBB8CFD.3050602@grandegger.com> <4EBEE043.6070601@grandegger.com> <4EBEE1D8.7040407@grandegger.com> <4EC01B12.5050404@grandegger.com> <4EC0E4BE.4010101@grandegger.com> <4EC13191.6070901@grandegger.com> <4EC21D95.5070508@grandegger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-users-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-users-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org To: Willy Lambert Cc: "socketcan-users-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org" , linux-can-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-can.vger.kernel.org On 11/15/2011 01:28 PM, Willy Lambert wrote: > 2011/11/15 Wolfgang Grandegger : ... >>> Do you wish any further tests ? >> >> Does the following command work as well? >> >> modprobe sja1000_isa irq=10,10 mem=0xD0000,0xD0200 ocr=0x5e cdr=0 >> >> Does re-loading of the driver work properly? >> >> rmmod sja1000_isa; insmod sja1000_isa ... >> > > all this is working. Good. >> Similar tests on a x86_64 system and with a recent kernel version would >> be nice to have. >> >> Thanks, > > This is not possible a present time, I don't have any 64b img to put > on my board and I don't have the time to create a new one. Sorry. OK, no problem. I'm already confident enough to push this patch mainline. Thanks for your effort. Wolfgang.