Re: git-tree, NOW!

[Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2253 bytes --]

On 12/01/2011 10:30 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 10:16 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
[...]

> Yes. So far we just tried to signal "patch is now ready" by adding our
> "acked-by"... which does not work for a series of patches, espcially if
> it touches other sub-systems as well (powerpc, devicetree).

Yes - but David sometimes merges patches if they are not reviewed. Like
the pch-can driver, where I missed to reply to net-dev.

>> I like Oliver's remark to first keep the discussion on the linux-can
>> mailinglist and post the "final" series on netdev.
> 
> Yes, don't ask me why I did not do that first, especially because some
> tested-by's would have be useful. I also learned that some more serious
> compile tests have to be done for different archs (x86, powerpc, arm, ...).

>>> That's also what Dave asks for. Apart from the tree he asks for someone
>>> who acts as the one and only interface to him.
>>
>> Yes, technically that could/should be the git tree, in persona Wolfgang
>> or/and (as Dave asked for one person) Oliver.
> 
> Oliver?

+1

>>>> I've setup a git repo on gitorious:
>>>>
>>>> https://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can
>>>>
>>>> It's based on net-next, and currently David's net-next/master is pushing
>>>> there. It probably takes some time, the box pushing has just 4 mbit/s
>>>> upstream.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Apart from net-next, we may also need the net tree (as branch?).
>>
>> During merge windows David merges into his net-next tree, anyway I can
>> setup linux-can and linux-can-next, based on the linux-net and
>> linux-net-next trees.
> 
> Do we need two trees? I thinks you can save a lot of bandwith (and disk
> space) by using just one tree and two branches.

If you want to safe bandwith on your PC, you can $(git remote add) them
into one tree.

Meanwhile there's a linux-can and a linux-can-next on gitorious. The
latter one is still uploading.

Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 188 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core