From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] CAN MAINTAINERS Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:15:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED8CF58.3010109@hartkopp.net> References: <48E9EDF6.4000009@pengutronix.de> <4ED6B460.2010508@pengutronix.de> <4ED7351E.2010907@grandegger.com> <4ED745F6.8030302@pengutronix.de> <4ED7494F.6080603@grandegger.com> <4ED74AC7.40605@pengutronix.de> <4ED75BD0.6070802@hartkopp.net> <4ED75EED.6010009@pengutronix.de> <4ED89050.3040201@hartkopp.net> <4ED8C2EB.1070507@pengutronix.de> <4ED8C5D8.6000505@grandegger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.162]:28880 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754311Ab1LBNPM (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:15:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4ED8C5D8.6000505@grandegger.com> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Wolfgang Grandegger , Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, Urs Thuermann , "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" On 02.12.2011 13:34, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 12/02/2011 01:22 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 12/02/2011 09:46 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >>> Hey Marc, >>> >>> i'm not as good as you using git. Indeed i'm a git newbie and do not have the >>> time right now to get in that deep that i dare to post correct pull requests >>> to netdev. >>> >>> Following the hints from Dave i checked the MAINTAINERS file how the wireless >>> guys handle their subsystem in detail. Regarding John Linville, who's >>> collecting all the stuff from several people to send finally push requests to >>> Dave i would suggest that you become our 'John Linville for CAN'. >> >> Wolfgang and me talked about this (via PM), too. We do the job together, >> but I send the pull requests to Dave. > > Thanks! Many thanks! > >>> You speak git fluently and you know the project very good - so my suggestion >>> to clean up the MAINTAINTERS file is this: >> >> The cleanups look got, however, do we need the linux-can tree. Do the >> wireless people have two trees? > > I would drop it for the time being. Ok. So we stick to use Daves net-tree for fixes and send patches for the net-tree the old way, right? > >>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>> index 717d9e9..af8a0a9 100644 >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>> @@ -1707,11 +1707,8 @@ F: arch/x86/include/asm/tce.h >>> >>> CAN NETWORK LAYER >>> M: Oliver Hartkopp >>> -M: Oliver Hartkopp >>> -M: Urs Thuermann >>> L: linux-can@vger.kernel.org >>> -L: netdev@vger.kernel.org >> >> this should focus the discussion on linux-can > > Well, but I think the patches still need to be presented on the netdev > ml? We should clarify that. I already thought about that too. I think for CAN drivers there's no need for extra discussions on netdev. But for net/can changes i would always post the patches on linux-can and netdev to get the networking guys like Eric and Patrick into the loop for a review. Btw. we should ask if Dave would like the stuff from our linux-can-next only as pull request or additionally in full source code. Just to make it sure: When there are new ideas in net/can i would only post RFCs on netdev & linux-can. And once there is no new feedback - what would be the correct way: - send it on netdev and then acked-by Marc - send it on linux-can, push it into linux-can-next, and send a pull request? ??? > >>> -W: http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ >>> +W: http://gitorious.org/linux-can >> >> the can utils are now migrated (im my repo still) fine. >> >>> S: Maintained >>> F: net/can/ >>> F: include/linux/can.h >>> @@ -1723,8 +1720,7 @@ F: include/linux/can/gw.h >>> CAN NETWORK DRIVERS >>> M: Wolfgang Grandegger >>> L: linux-can@vger.kernel.org >>> -L: netdev@vger.kernel.org >>> -W: http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ >>> +W: http://gitorious.org/linux-can >>> S: Maintained >>> F: drivers/net/can/ >>> F: include/linux/can/dev.h >>> @@ -4587,6 +4583,17 @@ F: include/linux/wireless.h >>> F: include/net/iw_handler.h >>> F: drivers/net/wireless/ >>> >>> +NETWORKING [CAN] >>> +M: Marc Kleine-Budde >>> +L: linux-can@vger.kernel.org >>> +W: http://gitorious.org/linux-can >>> +T: git://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can.git >> >> do we need this tree? > > I don't think so. You should be added to the CAN NETWORK DRIVERS entry > above. Here is an update: diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 717d9e9..7417c92 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1707,11 +1707,8 @@ F: arch/x86/include/asm/tce.h CAN NETWORK LAYER M: Oliver Hartkopp -M: Oliver Hartkopp -M: Urs Thuermann L: linux-can@vger.kernel.org -L: netdev@vger.kernel.org -W: http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ +W: http://gitorious.org/linux-can S: Maintained F: net/can/ F: include/linux/can.h @@ -1722,9 +1719,9 @@ F: include/linux/can/gw.h CAN NETWORK DRIVERS M: Wolfgang Grandegger +M: Marc Kleine-Budde L: linux-can@vger.kernel.org -L: netdev@vger.kernel.org -W: http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ +W: http://gitorious.org/linux-can S: Maintained F: drivers/net/can/ F: include/linux/can/dev.h @@ -4587,6 +4584,16 @@ F: include/linux/wireless.h F: include/net/iw_handler.h F: drivers/net/wireless/ +NETWORKING [CAN] +M: Marc Kleine-Budde +L: linux-can@vger.kernel.org +W: http://gitorious.org/linux-can +T: git://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next.git +S: Maintained +F: net/can/ +F: drivers/net/can/ +F: include/linux/can* + NETWORKING DRIVERS L: netdev@vger.kernel.org W: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net Regards, Oliver