From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] can/sja1000: Add PEAK-System PCIe/PCIeC and miniPCI boards Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:16:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4F2805D8.7090401@grandegger.com> References: <1328015960-14744-1-git-send-email-s.grosjean@peak-system.com> <1328015960-14744-2-git-send-email-s.grosjean@peak-system.com> <4F27EBC5.3060805@pengutronix.de> <4F280245.60809@peak-system.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ngcobalt02.manitu.net ([217.11.48.102]:59418 "EHLO ngcobalt02.manitu.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754398Ab2AaPQt (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:16:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F280245.60809@peak-system.com> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: s.grosjean@peak-system.com Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , Oliver Hartkopp , linux-can Mailing List On 01/31/2012 04:01 PM, Stephane Grosjean wrote: > Hi Marc, > > What do you mean please? You want me to post 4 patches? One for each new > board, plus one for the channels list management? For 2 of the 3 boards, > this is as simple as adding a line into the device ids table, excepting > the ExpressCard for which I added the management of the funky leds. > Thanks for any clarification. I think he wants two separate patches, instead a series of patches. One patch for peak_pci and another for peak_pcmcia. Which does make sense as they do not belong together. Wolfgang.