From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: s.grosjean@peak-system.com
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
Sebastian Haas <dev@sebastianhaas.info>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: About PCAN-USB issues
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:58:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F282BB5.40006@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F1EE678.2050604@peak-system.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1730 bytes --]
On 01/24/2012 06:12 PM, Stephane Grosjean wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm finally back to the linux-can... I'm currently working on several
> projects so the peak_usb did progress slowly these last days...
>
> Back to the issue: I changed the way the can state is handled in the
> peak_usb driver and finally get an easy tesbed to create bus-off
> events... Now, the driver puts the candev into that state only once, no
> more periodic error-warnings or else. I'm looking now to how the restart
> mechanism works.
>
> 1st: since the restart can be automatic, the related do_set_mode
> callback is called from a timer context, in which you're not allowed to
> sleep. So I suppose this is the reason of some Kernel hangs you (Oliver)
> detected last week: the peak_usb driver (tries to) reset the device by
> sending an usb message, using usb_bulk_msg(), which usage is not allowed
> in such a context! To confirm, is someone able to do the same with the
> ems_usb driver, please? It seems that this driver acts as the peak_usb
> does.
>
> Moreover, it seems that the "manual" restart is also called from such a
> timer context, so the consequences are the same...
>
> I'll have to change the way that reset is done into full asynchronous mode.
Does it make sense to replace the timer by a workqueue and schedule it
by schedule_delayed_work(). On the downside a workqueue can only be
delayed in jiffies granularity.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-31 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1567213.2GCzMlGyKY@lisa>
2012-01-24 12:01 ` increase buffer size Oliver Hartkopp
2012-01-24 15:42 ` [Socketcan-users] " Steffen Rose
2012-01-24 16:17 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-01-24 17:12 ` About PCAN-USB issues Stephane Grosjean
2012-01-25 10:25 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-01-31 17:58 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F282BB5.40006@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=dev@sebastianhaas.info \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.grosjean@peak-system.com \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).