From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] CAN updates for net-next, please review Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:24:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4F2912E7.6070802@grandegger.com> References: <1328046410-21392-1-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de> <4F290933.9060202@grandegger.com> <4F290A38.8080807@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ngcobalt02.manitu.net ([217.11.48.102]:56791 "EHLO ngcobalt02.manitu.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754050Ab2BAKYs (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 05:24:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F290A38.8080807@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org On 02/01/2012 10:47 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > Hey, > > On 02/01/2012 10:43 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>> I collected all pending patches from the mailinglist in order to push to >>> davem. Are there some patches missing, which are rerady to go upstream? >> >> The patch "[PATCH 04/12] can: replace the dev_dbg/info/err/... with the >> new netdev_xxx macros" does have issues. Did you already apply it to >> linux-can-next? Shoud I send a v2 or a followup patch? I have also > > No, it's still in my repo. Please send a v2. > >> another fix for the ti_hecc driver, which I will send in a few minutes. > > Go ahead. I'll have to setup a compile time test script anyway. Before pinging Dave, I could do some regression builds here as well. Wolfgang.