From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] c_can: add driver for the PCH CAN controller Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:27:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4F46066D.60601@grandegger.com> References: <4F44E640.8010708@grandegger.com> <1626144.8BPv1GvbeG@ws-stein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ngcobalt02.manitu.net ([217.11.48.102]:53214 "EHLO ngcobalt02.manitu.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750841Ab2BWJ1M (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:27:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1626144.8BPv1GvbeG@ws-stein> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexander Stein Cc: Linux-CAN , "bhupesh.sharma" , Tomoya MORINAGA Hi Alexander, On 02/23/2012 09:27 AM, Alexander Stein wrote: > Hello Wolfgang, > > Am Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2012, 13:57:36 schrieb Wolfgang Grandegger: >> For maintenance reasons, this diver should replace the "pch_can" driver >> sooner than later as it uses the same CAN controller core. I named it >> "pch_pci". Maybe "pch_can" would be more appropriate (common). This >> patch is for 2.6.39, but likely it applies fine also to more recent >> versions of the Linux kernel. >> >> Alexander, Tomoya, or anybody else, it would be nice if you could test >> this patch and give some feedback. Thanks. > > What is the current state of c_can? Are there known bugs/issues? Bhupes said that he has a series of changes for the C_CAN driver but I don't know if they fix serious bugs. Apart from that, there are no pending issues, IIRC. Wolfgang.