public inbox for linux-can@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: dev@sebastianhaas.info, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] can: Introducing CANFD for af_can & can-raw
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:19:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F69D56C.9050607@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120321125130.GC3372@vandijck-laurijssen.be>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2289 bytes --]

On 03/21/2012 01:51 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
>>>> What about
>>>> the RX path? We can just use the new 64 byte CAN frames and have to
>>>> tweak the CAN_RAW if the read from the userspace is too small.
>>> You may have noticed that I did not need to do anything
>>> in the receive path in order to receive longer frames.
>>>
>>> look at this block in raw_recvmsg:
>>>
>>> 	if (size < skb->len)
>>> 		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
>>> 	else
>>> 		size = skb->len;
>>>
>>> Even today already, you can recv. with smaller or bigger buffers than
>>> the actual CAN frame.
>>
>> ...using an unmodified mainline kernel?
> 
> Must be. yes!
> I think that's good.

Indeed. I wasn't aware of this.

>>> I did try to let the kernel work with 64bytes, and still use
>>> 8byte frames in userspace. that all works, especially since noone
>>> seems to test for MSG_TRUNC.
>>
>> Have you checked _all_ CAN userspace applications? :P
>> We cannot break the ABI.
> I mentioned cansend & candump.
> I realize there's a lot of work ahead. I just started, and tried
> not to touch too much, and yet prove it can work.
> 
> I agree that we cannot break the current ABI.
> 
>>
>>> An improvement that just crosses my mind is something like:
>>>
>>> 	int real_len;
>>>
>>> 	real_len = offsetof(struct can_frame, data) +
>>> 		((struct can_frame)skb->data)->dlc;
>>> 	if (size < real_len)
>>> 		msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
>>> 	else
>>> 		size = real_len;
>>>
>>> Such would modify the ABI a bit more, but prevents copying unused bytes
>>> and avoids unnecessary MSG_TRUNC flags.
>>
>> I suggest to copy the full 8 bytes of data if dlc <= 8, for full ABI
>> compatibility.
> 
> Do we then agree that it is desired not to do this beyond the first 8 bytes?
> Moreover, we could depend this on the function parameter 'size'. If it
> is 16bytes, do as before, else do the new trick. Did I miss something then?

Yes, if 16 bytes is the length of the current struct can_frame.

Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-21 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-21  9:10 [RFC] can: Introducing CANFD for af_can & can-raw Kurt Van Dijck
     [not found] ` <E1SAIM4-0007a6-Sf@smtprelay03.ispgateway.de>
2012-03-21 11:05   ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-21 11:43     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-03-21 12:08       ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-21 12:32         ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-03-21 12:51           ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-21 13:19             ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2012-03-21 13:21           ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-03-21 13:53             ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-21 14:49               ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-03-21 15:26                 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-03-22  9:03                 ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-21 14:56               ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-03-21 15:05                 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-03-22  9:24                   ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-22  9:32                     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-03-22  9:38                     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-03-22 10:13                       ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-23 11:01                         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-03-22  9:57                   ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-22 10:06                     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-03-22 10:35                       ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-22 11:00                         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-03-22 12:25                           ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-03-22 12:47                             ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-21 13:29           ` Alexander Stein
2012-03-21 13:34             ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-03-21 13:51             ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-03-21 15:47               ` Alexander Stein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F69D56C.9050607@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=dev@sebastianhaas.info \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox