From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Martin Gysel <m.gysel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] can: add tx/rx led trigger support
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:02:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F86FC7E.5030709@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F86B75C.2040006@gmail.com>
On 12.04.2012 13:07, Martin Gysel wrote:
> Am 12.04.2012 09:37, schrieb Wolfgang Grandegger:
>> Concerning the LED control (on. off, blinking), could that not be
>> done/configured in the generic LED interface (via sysfs files)? That
>> seems the right place for me. Then the CAN LED software just needs to
>> send the trigger which would significantly simplify the code (without
>> timer).
>>
>> Furthermore, if I understand your patch correctly, the LEDs with the
>> names "canX-rx" and "canX-tx" are directly assigned (hardwired). A more
>> flexible method would be appreciated, if it could be realized with just
>> a little more code.
>
> maybe something familiar to the led netdev trigger (which is afaik
> 'still' not mainline...)
>
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2776
Hm - "still not in mainline" is not really nice.
I think the original approach from Fabio was to follow the LED implementation
from mac80211:
"The implementation is similar to the MAC80211_LEDS one, and takes quite a lot
of inspiration and some code from it."
And IMHO we should follow this implementation as it is proved to be used in
high traffic netdev environments. I wonder if some 'generic gpio LED'
implementation will perform sufficiently.
Regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 21:39 [RFC PATCH] can: add tx/rx led trigger support Fabio Baltieri
2012-04-11 6:14 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-11 17:58 ` Fabio Baltieri
2012-04-11 18:29 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-11 18:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-04-12 6:16 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-11 19:02 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-11 19:36 ` Fabio Baltieri
2012-04-12 6:05 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-12 6:32 ` Alexander Stein
2012-04-12 15:52 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-12 18:30 ` Fabio Baltieri
2012-04-13 19:00 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-12 7:37 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-04-12 11:07 ` Martin Gysel
2012-04-12 16:02 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2012-04-12 16:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-04-12 17:28 ` Fabio Baltieri
2012-04-12 18:47 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-04-12 17:46 ` Fabio Baltieri
2012-04-12 18:53 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-04-11 6:29 ` Alexander Stein
2012-04-11 18:03 ` Fabio Baltieri
2012-04-11 14:45 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-04-11 16:24 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-04-11 19:11 ` Fabio Baltieri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F86FC7E.5030709@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.gysel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox