* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN [not found] <CAHvj1qbb9YJSBLZc1bG6MpEJcjPUtr+37wn3iJUNm_OmpH2SgA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2012-05-22 19:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger 2012-05-23 6:56 ` AnilKumar, Chimata 2012-06-19 7:58 ` bruce bushby 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-22 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bruce bushby; +Cc: Linux-CAN Hello, I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: > Greetings > > I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic > explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I > understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. > > I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 > What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN controller. See also: http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67538.html > Does D_CAN have anything to do with mcp2515? No, nothing apart from the fact that both are CAN controllers. The mcp2515 is connected via SPI bus and from another company. > In order to connect the am335x CAN line to a CAN bus, would I need to > add a CAN transceiver? Hardware-wise, yes. > Is the am335x an "in memory CAN" ... ie I wouldn't need to worry about > SPI bus performance? Right. On the AM335x, the D_CAN controller is integrated into the SOC. There is no SPI involved. > Any explanations and help much appreciated! Hope it's useful. Wolfgang. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-22 19:01 ` [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-23 6:56 ` AnilKumar, Chimata 2012-05-23 7:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger 2012-06-19 7:58 ` bruce bushby 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: AnilKumar, Chimata @ 2012-05-23 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfgang Grandegger, bruce bushby; +Cc: Linux-CAN Hi Wolfgang, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 00:31:06, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello, > > I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. > > On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: > > Greetings > > > > I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic > > explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I > > understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. > > > > I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 > > What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? > > As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN > controller. See also: > > http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp > http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp > > Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been > posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. Is there a possibility of pushing my driver into 3.5 kernel? Regards AnilKumar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 6:56 ` AnilKumar, Chimata @ 2012-05-23 7:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger 2012-05-23 7:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-23 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: AnilKumar, Chimata; +Cc: bruce bushby, Linux-CAN On 05/23/2012 08:56 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 00:31:06, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. >> >> On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: >>> Greetings >>> >>> I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic >>> explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I >>> understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. >>> >>> I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 >>> What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? >> >> As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN >> controller. See also: >> >> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp >> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp >> >> Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been >> posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. > > Is there a possibility of pushing my driver into 3.5 kernel? Yes, I think we should push it forward, even if the C_CAN part remains untested for the moment. IIRC, the patch series is already in a good shape. I personally do also not have a board with a C_CAN controller at hand. Marc, what is your opinion? Wolfgang. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 7:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-23 7:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde 2012-05-23 8:06 ` Wolfgang Grandegger 2012-05-23 8:07 ` Robert Schwebel 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2012-05-23 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfgang Grandegger; +Cc: AnilKumar, Chimata, bruce bushby, Linux-CAN [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1947 bytes --] On 05/23/2012 09:01 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 05/23/2012 08:56 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 00:31:06, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. >>> >>> On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: >>>> Greetings >>>> >>>> I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic >>>> explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I >>>> understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. >>>> >>>> I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 >>>> What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? >>> >>> As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN >>> controller. See also: >>> >>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp >>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp >>> >>> Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been >>> posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. >> >> Is there a possibility of pushing my driver into 3.5 kernel? > > Yes, I think we should push it forward, even if the C_CAN part remains > untested for the moment. IIRC, the patch series is already in a good > shape. I personally do also not have a board with a C_CAN controller at > hand. Marc, what is your opinion? I don't have any of the *_CAN hardware. But the driver looks quite good. I'm quite busy at the moment, but currently we've the merge window. I'll do a review now, anyway. Wolfgang can I have your Acked-by? Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 7:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2012-05-23 8:06 ` Wolfgang Grandegger 2012-05-23 8:27 ` AnilKumar, Chimata 2012-05-23 8:07 ` Robert Schwebel 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-23 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Kleine-Budde; +Cc: AnilKumar, Chimata, bruce bushby, Linux-CAN On 05/23/2012 09:05 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 05/23/2012 09:01 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> On 05/23/2012 08:56 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: >>> Hi Wolfgang, >>> >>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 00:31:06, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. >>>> >>>> On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: >>>>> Greetings >>>>> >>>>> I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic >>>>> explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I >>>>> understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. >>>>> >>>>> I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 >>>>> What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? >>>> >>>> As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN >>>> controller. See also: >>>> >>>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp >>>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp >>>> >>>> Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been >>>> posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. >>> >>> Is there a possibility of pushing my driver into 3.5 kernel? >> >> Yes, I think we should push it forward, even if the C_CAN part remains >> untested for the moment. IIRC, the patch series is already in a good >> shape. I personally do also not have a board with a C_CAN controller at >> hand. Marc, what is your opinion? > > I don't have any of the *_CAN hardware. But the driver looks quite good. > I'm quite busy at the moment, but currently we've the merge window. I'll > do a review now, anyway. Wolfgang can I have your Acked-by? I just tried to compile check the patches but they do not apply properly :(. AnilKumar, for what kernel tree are the patches you posted? They should be against David Miller's net-next tree? Wolfgang. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 8:06 ` Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-23 8:27 ` AnilKumar, Chimata 2012-05-23 8:40 ` Wolfgang Grandegger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: AnilKumar, Chimata @ 2012-05-23 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfgang Grandegger, Marc Kleine-Budde; +Cc: bruce bushby, Linux-CAN Hi Wolfgang, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 13:36:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 05/23/2012 09:05 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > On 05/23/2012 09:01 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> On 05/23/2012 08:56 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > >>> Hi Wolfgang, > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 00:31:06, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. > >>>> > >>>> On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: > >>>>> Greetings > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic > >>>>> explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I > >>>>> understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 > >>>>> What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? > >>>> > >>>> As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN > >>>> controller. See also: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp > >>>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp > >>>> > >>>> Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been > >>>> posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. > >>> > >>> Is there a possibility of pushing my driver into 3.5 kernel? > >> > >> Yes, I think we should push it forward, even if the C_CAN part remains > >> untested for the moment. IIRC, the patch series is already in a good > >> shape. I personally do also not have a board with a C_CAN controller at > >> hand. Marc, what is your opinion? > > > > I don't have any of the *_CAN hardware. But the driver looks quite good. > > I'm quite busy at the moment, but currently we've the merge window. I'll > > do a review now, anyway. Wolfgang can I have your Acked-by? > > I just tried to compile check the patches but they do not apply properly > :(. AnilKumar, for what kernel tree are the patches you posted? They > should be against David Miller's net-next tree? I have generated the patch series with "v3.4-rc6". I can quickly spin patches with the latest tip Regards AnilKumar ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 8:27 ` AnilKumar, Chimata @ 2012-05-23 8:40 ` Wolfgang Grandegger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-23 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: AnilKumar, Chimata; +Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, bruce bushby, Linux-CAN On 05/23/2012 10:27 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 13:36:13, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> On 05/23/2012 09:05 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>> On 05/23/2012 09:01 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>> On 05/23/2012 08:56 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: >>>>> Hi Wolfgang, >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 00:31:06, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: >>>>>>> Greetings >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic >>>>>>> explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I >>>>>>> understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 >>>>>>> What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? >>>>>> >>>>>> As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN >>>>>> controller. See also: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp >>>>>> http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp >>>>>> >>>>>> Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been >>>>>> posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a possibility of pushing my driver into 3.5 kernel? >>>> >>>> Yes, I think we should push it forward, even if the C_CAN part remains >>>> untested for the moment. IIRC, the patch series is already in a good >>>> shape. I personally do also not have a board with a C_CAN controller at >>>> hand. Marc, what is your opinion? >>> >>> I don't have any of the *_CAN hardware. But the driver looks quite good. >>> I'm quite busy at the moment, but currently we've the merge window. I'll >>> do a review now, anyway. Wolfgang can I have your Acked-by? >> >> I just tried to compile check the patches but they do not apply properly >> :(. AnilKumar, for what kernel tree are the patches you posted? They >> should be against David Miller's net-next tree? > > I have generated the patch series with "v3.4-rc6". I can quickly spin patches with > the latest tip That would be nice. We need the patches against: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git Thanks, Wolfgang. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 7:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde 2012-05-23 8:06 ` Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2012-05-23 8:07 ` Robert Schwebel 2012-05-23 8:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Robert Schwebel @ 2012-05-23 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger, AnilKumar, Chimata, bruce bushby, Linux-CAN [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1005 bytes --] Hi Marc, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:05:09AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > Yes, I think we should push it forward, even if the C_CAN part > > remains untested for the moment. IIRC, the patch series is already > > in a good shape. I personally do also not have a board with a C_CAN > > controller at hand. Marc, what is your opinion? > > I don't have any of the *_CAN hardware. But the driver looks quite > good. I'm quite busy at the moment, but currently we've the merge > window. I'll do a review now, anyway. Wolfgang can I have your > Acked-by? We have a BeagleBone in the PTX Lab, with an AM3359, which has the CAN port on the extension header. Does that help? rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 8:07 ` Robert Schwebel @ 2012-05-23 8:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde 2012-05-23 8:10 ` Robert Schwebel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2012-05-23 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Schwebel Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger, AnilKumar, Chimata, bruce bushby, Linux-CAN [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1106 bytes --] On 05/23/2012 10:07 AM, Robert Schwebel wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:05:09AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>> Yes, I think we should push it forward, even if the C_CAN part >>> remains untested for the moment. IIRC, the patch series is already >>> in a good shape. I personally do also not have a board with a C_CAN >>> controller at hand. Marc, what is your opinion? >> >> I don't have any of the *_CAN hardware. But the driver looks quite >> good. I'm quite busy at the moment, but currently we've the merge >> window. I'll do a review now, anyway. Wolfgang can I have your >> Acked-by? > > We have a BeagleBone in the PTX Lab, with an AM3359, which has the CAN > port on the extension header. Does that help? Sure \o/, if our soldermaster can attach it to our CAN network. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-23 8:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2012-05-23 8:10 ` Robert Schwebel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Robert Schwebel @ 2012-05-23 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Kleine-Budde Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger, AnilKumar, Chimata, bruce bushby, Linux-CAN [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 926 bytes --] On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:08:18AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> I don't have any of the *_CAN hardware. But the driver looks quite > >> good. I'm quite busy at the moment, but currently we've the merge > >> window. I'll do a review now, anyway. Wolfgang can I have your > >> Acked-by? > > > > We have a BeagleBone in the PTX Lab, with an AM3359, which has the > > CAN port on the extension header. Does that help? > > Sure \o/, if our soldermaster can attach it to our CAN network. I'll ask him when he's in the office :-) However, you might need to port mainline linux to it first... rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN 2012-05-22 19:01 ` [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN Wolfgang Grandegger 2012-05-23 6:56 ` AnilKumar, Chimata @ 2012-06-19 7:58 ` bruce bushby 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: bruce bushby @ 2012-06-19 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wolfgang Grandegger; +Cc: Linux-CAN Hi Wolfgang/Oliver Thank you for your response, much appreciated!! Clearly I've got some reading to do :) Regards Bruce Bushby On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I switched the discussion to the new Linux-CAN mailing list. > > On 05/22/2012 05:50 PM, bruce bushby wrote: >> Greetings >> >> I'm hoping a list member would be so kind as to offer some basic >> explanations of how one would use the CAN bus provided by AM335x. I >> understand Linux, but struggle with electronics. >> >> I have read this discussion: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/1142 >> What is the difference between C_CAN and D_CAN? > > As I see it, the D_CAN is a more advanced variant of the C_CAN > controller. See also: > > http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp > http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/d_can/d_can.asp > > Patches to add D_CAN support to the Linux-CAN C_CAN driver have been > posted recently for mainline inclusion and are currently reviewed. > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67538.html >> Does D_CAN have anything to do with mcp2515? > > No, nothing apart from the fact that both are CAN controllers. The > mcp2515 is connected via SPI bus and from another company. > >> In order to connect the am335x CAN line to a CAN bus, would I need to >> add a CAN transceiver? > > Hardware-wise, yes. > >> Is the am335x an "in memory CAN" ... ie I wouldn't need to worry about >> SPI bus performance? > > Right. On the AM335x, the D_CAN controller is integrated into the SOC. > There is no SPI involved. > >> Any explanations and help much appreciated! > > Hope it's useful. > > Wolfgang. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-19 7:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAHvj1qbb9YJSBLZc1bG6MpEJcjPUtr+37wn3iJUNm_OmpH2SgA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-22 19:01 ` [Socketcan-users] AM335x CAN/D_CAN Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-05-23 6:56 ` AnilKumar, Chimata
2012-05-23 7:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-05-23 7:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-05-23 8:06 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-05-23 8:27 ` AnilKumar, Chimata
2012-05-23 8:40 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-05-23 8:07 ` Robert Schwebel
2012-05-23 8:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-05-23 8:10 ` Robert Schwebel
2012-06-19 7:58 ` bruce bushby
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).