From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Mohamed HAMZAOUI <requinham@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>,
linux-can Mailing List <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SocketCan] Problem of accuracy
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:32:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF8102C.8030609@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABMxt4h2mm+FDKBKAGW=UvgOZJVUEmkrH9yKULZaJz5P5HvyBQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/07/2012 12:02 PM, Mohamed HAMZAOUI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recompiled the Kernel with activate preemption. I test cangen and
> tst-bcm-cycle but i have the same result around accuracy. I tried to
> change the application priority with nice command to high priority but
> the problem persist !
This problem is not CAN related. Anyway, you can read/try/check:
- are high-resolution timers enabled in your kernel?
- use cyclictest [1] to measure user-space timing accuracy.
- use clock_nanosleep for periodic tasks.
- try to start cangen with "chrt -f 10 cangen can0".
- read "man sched_setscheduler" for a description of the Linux
scheduling scheme.
[1] https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Cyclictest
Wolfgang.
> Le jeudi 5 juillet 2012, Oliver Hartkopp a écrit :
>>
>> On 05.07.2012 10:12, Mohamed HAMZAOUI wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i'm a new user of socketcan and, i cross compile can-utils for my craneboard
>>> card (a card with CAN).
>>> When i run cangen with 1 ms period, the period is not respected (1,407, 1.399,
>>> ...) !
>>>
>>> How can i fix this problem ?
>>>
>>> my can version in /proc/net/can/version is "rev 20090105 abi 8" and i'm on
>>> : Linux am3517-crane 2.6.32 #1 Mon Apr 23 00:13:28 CEST 2012 armv7l GNU/Linux
>>>
>>
>> Hello Mohamed,
>>
>> first please move to the new CAN mailing list (see CC) - and don't use HTML-mails (text-only is better) ;-)
>>
>> Regarding your problem:
>>
>> Usually i get smaller derivations on my system - but your Linux box is probably not very fast, so that you can see these scheduling influences with cangen ...
>>
>> cangen is a userpace app and therefore it is usually not that precise as hrtimers inside the Linux kernel (if you don't use any realtime Linux).
>>
>> But you may try the Broadcast-Manager to place a 'cyclic sending job' inside the Linux kernel. See an example here:
>>
>> http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/socketcan/trunk/test/tst-bcm-cycle.c
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oliver
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-can" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-07 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CABMxt4ijuTMYFYXx0n4AYBO6-=SRD0U3F4BTA2=rWE80Z4-yOA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-05 8:38 ` Problem of accuracy Oliver Hartkopp
2012-07-07 10:02 ` [SocketCan] " Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-07 10:32 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2012-07-08 19:43 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-08 20:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-08 20:30 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 7:18 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-09 8:14 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 8:20 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-09 9:19 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 9:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <CABMxt4jnztXqAmLFcBnqp3001QXds1nX3xA2y_ka=xCNr0cjjA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4FFAB09F.6090800@grandegger.com>
[not found] ` <CABMxt4jLRKz8xKNbH3Qa=P0k1aEjMsqmo2vArGDo2O1Wf0=wGQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-09 11:26 ` Fwd: " Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 11:40 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-09 11:57 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 12:15 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-09 13:19 ` Pavel Pisa
2012-07-09 14:29 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 14:35 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 14:40 ` Kurt Van Dijck
2012-07-09 14:57 ` Alexander Stein
2012-07-09 15:39 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-09 17:08 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2012-07-09 20:50 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-10 22:11 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-11 12:35 ` Mohamed HAMZAOUI
2012-07-11 22:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-11 22:19 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-07-09 6:55 ` Kurt Van Dijck
[not found] ` <1341488146.2416.9.camel@slaptop>
2012-07-05 13:57 ` [Socketcan-users] back to back can frames Kurt Van Dijck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF8102C.8030609@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de \
--cc=requinham@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox