linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, bhupesh.sharma@st.com, tomoya.rohm@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] c_can: use different sets of interface registers for rx and tx
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:39:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B870B1.4050907@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354199987-10350-4-git-send-email-wg@grandegger.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4953 bytes --]

On 11/29/2012 03:39 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> To avoid conflicts between CPU access to the message RAM we now
> use the first set of interface registers for RX and the second
> for TX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> index 3ae356f..27e45e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,10 @@
>  #define C_CAN_NEXT_MSG_OBJ_MASK	(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)
>  #define RECEIVE_OBJECT_BITS	0x0000ffff
>  
> +/* message interface used for rx and tx */
> +#define IFACE_RX		0
> +#define IFACE_TX		1

Can you give these defines a common C_CAN_ prefix? And you can make them
an enum and change the signature of the function you're changing below.

Marc

> +
>  /* status interrupt */
>  #define STATUS_INTERRUPT	0x8000
>  
> @@ -544,7 +548,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t c_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	msg_obj_no = get_tx_next_msg_obj(priv);
>  
>  	/* prepare message object for transmission */
> -	c_can_write_msg_object(dev, 0, frame, msg_obj_no);
> +	c_can_write_msg_object(dev, IFACE_TX, frame, msg_obj_no);
>  	can_put_echo_skb(skb, dev, msg_obj_no - C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -606,16 +610,18 @@ static void c_can_configure_msg_objects(struct net_device *dev)
>  	int i;
>  
>  	/* first invalidate all message objects */
> -	for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST; i <= C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS; i++)
> -		c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, 0, i);
> +	for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST; i <= C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST; i++)
> +		c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IFACE_RX, i);
> +	for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST; i <= C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_LAST; i++)
> +		c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IFACE_TX, i);
>  
>  	/* setup receive message objects */
>  	for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST; i < C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST; i++)
> -		c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, 0, i, 0, 0,
> +		c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IFACE_RX, i, 0, 0,
>  			(IF_MCONT_RXIE | IF_MCONT_UMASK) & ~IF_MCONT_EOB);
>  
> -	c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, 0, C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST, 0, 0,
> -			IF_MCONT_EOB | IF_MCONT_RXIE | IF_MCONT_UMASK);
> +	c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IFACE_RX, C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST,
> +			0, 0, IF_MCONT_EOB | IF_MCONT_RXIE | IF_MCONT_UMASK);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -748,10 +754,10 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
>  			can_get_echo_skb(dev,
>  					msg_obj_no - C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST);
>  			stats->tx_bytes += priv->read_reg(priv,
> -					C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, 0))
> +					C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, IFACE_TX))
>  					& IF_MCONT_DLC_MASK;
>  			stats->tx_packets++;
> -			c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, 0, msg_obj_no);
> +			c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IFACE_TX, msg_obj_no);
>  		} else {
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -801,16 +807,17 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
>  		 * message object n, we need to handle the same properly.
>  		 */
>  		if (val & (1 << (msg_obj - 1))) {
> -			c_can_object_get(dev, 0, msg_obj, IF_COMM_ALL &
> +			c_can_object_get(dev, IFACE_RX, msg_obj, IF_COMM_ALL &
>  					~IF_COMM_TXRQST);
>  			msg_ctrl_save = priv->read_reg(priv,
> -					C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, 0));
> +					C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, IFACE_RX));
>  
>  			if (msg_ctrl_save & IF_MCONT_EOB)
>  				return num_rx_pkts;
>  
>  			if (msg_ctrl_save & IF_MCONT_MSGLST) {
> -				c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, 0, msg_obj);
> +				c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, IFACE_RX,
> +								msg_obj);
>  				num_rx_pkts++;
>  				quota--;
>  				continue;
> @@ -820,19 +827,19 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
>  				continue;
>  
>  			/* read the data from the message object */
> -			c_can_read_msg_object(dev, 0, msg_ctrl_save);
> +			c_can_read_msg_object(dev, IFACE_RX, msg_ctrl_save);
>  
>  			if (msg_obj < C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST)
> -				c_can_mark_rx_msg_obj(dev, 0,
> +				c_can_mark_rx_msg_obj(dev, IFACE_RX,
>  						msg_ctrl_save, msg_obj);
>  			else if (msg_obj > C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST)
>  				/* activate this msg obj */
> -				c_can_activate_rx_msg_obj(dev, 0,
> +				c_can_activate_rx_msg_obj(dev, IFACE_RX,
>  						msg_ctrl_save, msg_obj);
>  			else if (msg_obj == C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST)
>  				/* activate all lower message objects */
>  				c_can_activate_all_lower_rx_msg_obj(dev,
> -						0, msg_ctrl_save);
> +						IFACE_RX, msg_ctrl_save);
>  
>  			num_rx_pkts++;
>  			quota--;
> 


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-30  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-29 14:39 [RFC v2 0/7] pch_can/c_can: fix races and add PCH support to c_can Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-29 14:39 ` [RFC v2 1/7] pch_can: add spinlocks to protect tx objects Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-29 14:39 ` [RFC v2 2/7] c_can: rename callback "initram" to "init" to more general usage Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-03 14:20   ` Alexander Stein
2012-12-03 14:32     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-29 14:39 ` [RFC v2 3/7] c_can: use different sets of interface registers for rx and tx Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-30  8:39   ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2012-11-30  9:15     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-29 14:39 ` [RFC v2 4/7] c_can_pci: introduce board specific PCI bar Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-30  8:45   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-11-30  9:11     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-30  9:19       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-11-29 14:39 ` [RFC v2 5/7] c_can_pci: enable PCI bus master only for MSI Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-30  8:54   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-11-29 14:39 ` [RFC v2 6/7] c_can_pci: add support for PCH CAN on Intel EG20T PCH Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-11-29 14:39 ` [RFC v2 7/7] c_can: add spinlock to protect tx and rx objects Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-05 12:09 ` [RFC v2 0/7] pch_can/c_can: fix races and add PCH support to c_can Alexander Stein
2012-12-05 12:50   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-05 14:46     ` Alexander Stein
2012-12-05 17:35       ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-05 21:52         ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-12-06  7:09           ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-06  8:35             ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-12-06  8:17         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-06 13:38         ` Alexander Stein
2012-12-06 14:02           ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-12-06 14:31           ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-06 14:37             ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-12-06 14:56             ` Alexander Stein
2012-12-06 15:15               ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-06 15:27                 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-06 15:55                   ` Alexander Stein
2012-12-06 17:14             ` Alexander Stein
2012-12-06 23:34               ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-12-07  9:26                 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-07  9:55                   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-12-07 10:00                     ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-12-07 10:09                       ` Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B870B1.4050907@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=bhupesh.sharma@st.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomoya.rohm@gmail.com \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).