From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: Re: Debian packages for can-utils Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:04:00 +0100 Message-ID: <50CB15B0.5020004@pengutronix.de> References: <1355480441.13230.1.camel@mpslxmarvin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6CE4828F7D133ACA04215626" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:49654 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751589Ab2LNMEE (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 07:04:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1355480441.13230.1.camel@mpslxmarvin> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stefan May Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6CE4828F7D133ACA04215626 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/14/2012 11:20 AM, Stefan May wrote: > Is anyone working on Debian packages for can-utils? I don't think so. Regarding the tar-balls, I just (re)asked the kernel.org maintainers if we can put the tarballs on the the kernel.org infrastructure. Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | --------------enig6CE4828F7D133ACA04215626 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDLFbAACgkQjTAFq1RaXHOiUACgmTOq1+cf806Qd0LH2pNROkKU leIAoJnG+rGBMA0s2VvDhtDCL08VpIzP =Ck/4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6CE4828F7D133ACA04215626--